The positive topic of dog slaughter is justified
Have you noticed that those so-called "dog lovers" are extremely "hypocritical"?
First of all, the concepts of human being and dog are confused, how can animals and human beings sit together? Human beings are the spirits of all living things, and dogs are destined to have a lower status than higher creatures. This is a common sense point that the "Dog Moral Taliban" is selectively pretending to be stupid.
Since we want to ban dog meat, why don't these "Dog Moral Taliban" give up eating meat from now on, put down their "butcher's mouths" and stop stuffing their mouths with chickens, ducks, geese, fish, goats and cows? Let's see how many of these hypocritical dog lovers can do that. With such a celebration of life, should the global village change to a vegetarian diet from now on? After satisfying their appetites and enhancing their sense of well-being, they can then stand on moral high ground and point their fingers at other dog-eaters, who really don't know how to write the word "ugly".
Today's society is characterized by a bunch of bored people keeping pets, and the so-called pet owners issuing warnings to the diners to stop them from eating, which is simply unconscionable. If pet pigs and ducks become popular in the future, will the standard of fasting orders be raised again? This type of dog lover suffering from dog fetishism is comically motivated and fun to watch.
Eating dog meat has been a part of Chinese culture for thousands of years. Li Shizhen mentioned in his "Compendium of Materia Medica" that dog meat is good for tonifying the kidneys and invigorating the blood; cooking dog meat was the highlight of the emperor's imperial meals or hospitality for ambassadors. But based on the fact that the Chinese are the most foreign-oriented, imitating Western standards and applying Western values to China, it certainly doesn't work.
What's more, the Western food culture also has a cruel side: the French eat horse meat, the Americans slaughter turkeys, the Japanese hunt whales, and the world is built on the level of the weak and the strong. Chinese people like to pick up the childish taste of the Western left, never see the "double standards" of others. The world's food history, only "delicious" and "not delicious", there is no such thing as cruelty or not cruelty.
So, if you don't like to eat meat dogs, please respect other diners' choices, human nature does not need to pretend x, to stage "human and dog love" please you over the main, you can constrain yourself, but you can't use your standards to constrain others.
The topic of the opposite side of the slaughter of dogs is a big regression in morality
Dog meat is not edible, please do not get entangled in the "eat sheep eat pigs" double standard, not is not, no need to argue, just as why today can not be restored to the "death sentence of death penalty The same reason why we can't reintroduce the "death penalty" today.
To today's standards, dogs and cats have been separated from the level of livestock, pets are spiritual, although the status of human beings, but than cows, pigs, chickens higher than a line, the idea of human nature, the status of such creatures second only to the human species, is not to be put on the table as food. As time progresses, old cultures are discarded, such as braided hair and feet, and it is a logical fallacy to apply ancient standards to today's world, which is called "Anachronism". There is a lot of common sense in the world that has evolved over time, and it's all very simple "1+1=2", so you don't need to talk too much about it to get to the bottom of it.
Taking Guangdong as an example, the Cantonese people ate pangolin, civet and monkey brains instead of cats and dogs, which induced the SARS plague and was undoubtedly a warning from God to the Chinese people. However, today's Chinese people do not see any restraint, but instead intensify their efforts to organize the "Dog Meat Festival", and a nation "can eat anything with its back turned to the sky", resulting in the emergence of horrifying news of "baby-eating museums" from time to time, which is precisely the reason why some people have gone overboard with the "Dog Meat Festival". Some of the "eaters" induced by the negative energy, like opening Pandora's box, this evil force caused by the disaster, is that you and I can not control.
As for "civilized countries" eating horsemeat, foie gras and whale meat, it is also a misleading interpretation. In the West, diners with this kind of addiction have always been regarded as "Shintai cat poop" by Westerners, and the Animal Welfare Institute has always been very critical of this kind of dietary addiction. The West is changing, you just haven't seen the results yet. All butchers in the West regularly go to psychiatrists for therapy or kneel down and beg priests for penance. Do the Chinese "porkers" have any such compassion?
What's more, the phrase "there are precedents in the West" itself comes from an obsession with the West. Why do you rationalize the killing of dogs by saying "there are precedents in the West"? Can you hypothetically imagine that there is such a crime in the West, but not in China? Why is it that there are always some bored Chinese who think: as long as the West is ugly, the stain on me will be minimized? To put it bluntly, it's all idiotic ideas used by dog-eating fetishists.
In today's 21st century, I implore you to think about it, eating dog meat, in the end, is the progress of civilization, or a big regression? If you, as a country, want to squeeze into the ranks of civilization and improve your international image, the other thing you can do, besides legalizing homosexuality, is to ban the eating of dog and cat meat. To be recognized by the world, you can only follow it.