I did it, but it's a pity that it's not what you think. 1, after the breach, the quality of the dike project in this section has been tested by the provincial quality inspection department on site, and there is no problem; 2. The embankment in this section was built in the early 1970s, and it is a mixed earth-rock embankment. It was reinforced in the early 1990s, and an impervious panel was added to the water front of the embankment. The official investigation conclusion of the cause of the breach shows that it is not the quality problem of dike construction; 3. The Prime Minister personally directed the gag on the spot. The Prime Minister's speech on the spot was like his inaugural speech, and his character of going through fire and water, hating evil and pleading for the people was dripping, so that he could understand and understand the reprimand of "tofu residue"; 4. The flood surges in at the breach. What should I do at this time? Try to block it! At this time, it is a pity to draw a conclusion without checking the reason, which is even more unclear. Fortunately, the facts are always facts, and no one can change them; 5. Bad things turn into good things. After the flood in 1998, the Prime Minister personally took charge of the national river regulation project, and the dikes and riverbanks in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were in full swing.

Thank you hap 132 for your concern for national affairs! Welcome to Jiujiang as a guest!

Attachment: The reason for the "gift" and "bean curd residue" project at that time: 1, 8# iron wire for pulling the formwork was left on the concrete surface of the 20cm thick seepage-proof panel at the breach site (the formwork was tightened by the screw, and it was partially reinforced by 8# iron wire for further fixing the formwork), which became the "evidence" that no steel bars were placed in the concrete; 2. The asphalt fir boards filled at the joints of impervious panels every15m become the "evidence" of mixing wood in concrete.