Who is right and who is wrong, I can't talk about it. I took out my cell phone, Baidu, Baidu snail, out of the following information: Fukushu snail is native to South America, the Amazon River Basin, is now distributed in the southeastern coast of China and other areas, the ability to reproduce is very strong, the whole body has a variety of parasites, like to eat young grass, especially rice, sweet potatoes, and so on, the young branches, was included in China's first batch of invasive alien species. From this point of view, the Fukushu snail should indeed be seen and killed as the boys said, in order to eliminate future problems. However, it is also mentioned in the information that the Fukushima snail is extremely reproducible. In other words, you can't solve the problem of snail infestation by stepping on one of them. On the contrary, although you satisfy your own sense of justice, but it may affect the beauty of the environment, increased the burden of cleaning aunts, the body of the snail may be infected with people or neighboring plants and so on, these may be the boy in the foot before never thought of the problem.

The boy held "for the people to get rid of the harm" thought and casually executed a life behavior, reminds me of Mr. Luo Xiang in the criminal law paradox ten lectures thrown a problem: criminal law is actually to protect people or punish people. When I first heard it, I felt very puzzled. Because in my cognition, the criminal law is to stand in the position of the victim to punish those criminals who have committed the most heinous crimes, why would it also protect the criminals? Mr. Luo Xiang's words explained my doubt very well: criminal law, on the one hand, punishes the criminals and protects the rights and interests of the victims' families. On the other hand, it also protects the right to life of the criminal to a certain extent. Let's look at the construction of the word punishment, which itself has the meaning of taking a person to death. In ancient times, officials led by the emperor had great power of life and death, so if no one was around to advise and supervise them, this power could easily be utilized to the detriment of the whole society. As a result, the tragedy of the unjust death of a loyal person is always on the stage in history, which makes the future generations sigh with regret. Therefore, after watching Mr. LUO Xiang's lesson, I suddenly realized that it is indeed a great pleasure to see a murderer who has committed a heinous crime sent to the guillotine with my own eyes, but we also have to realize whether criminal law is the only way to solve the problem of crime. The Qin Dynasty was an example of a country ruled by severe torture. Although it was effective, the cruel criminal law made the people panic every day, and finally, the people were so disturbed that they rose up in droves, and the state of Qin was destroyed. Nowadays, when a vicious incident breaks out, many netizens ask the court to impose the death penalty on the Internet before they have a clear understanding of the cause of the incident, as if the death penalty is not enough to alleviate people's anger. I am very impressed by a remark made by Mr. Luo Xiang: The right to life is premised on the moral norm that prohibits killing. This norm was intended to make us respect life and not to regret for life because of a momentary impulse in the face of conflict. But now, everything has changed. We have become more and more indifferent to life, a hot incident on the network can make netizens will be "death penalty" a word without thinking out of the mouth, many people have to follow the post.

Perhaps you will say, this is not an animal, can be compared with people?

First of all, the word "pest" is just a "label" that we humans put on plants and animals in nature. Since primitive times, we humans have been artificially modifying nature to make it more conducive to our survival. Thus, we have artificially categorized nature into harmful and beneficial plants and animals, which in themselves do not pose a threat to nature. On the contrary, they are a link in the ecological chain.

Secondly, isn't the proliferation of the Fuchsia snail caused by us humans artificially? Just like when a stone hits one's own foot, we should blame the one who moves the stone, not one who accuses the stone of being ungrateful. Since the snail has already caused a great loss to human beings, we should seek the power of natural purification and technology to solve the problem of the snail's proliferation, rather than through the brutal way of stomping them to death one by one.

Finally, Ms. Ou Lijuan often said, "People should not take themselves so damn important." All animals, including humans, have the right to live in this world. But in reality, we always see ourselves as the masters of the whole natural world and forget that we were once one of them, thus depriving plants and animals of their right to life. It is true that compared to the animals, we are very powerful and all the animals look away from us. But compared to the universe, what are we human beings? When we face the vastness of the universe, we will only feel that we are just a wisp of dust in the air. Therefore, we put ourselves in the shoes of the animals, see us know that we are far away, can we do as they do?

All in all, on the one hand, Fukushima snail is indeed a scourge for us humans, and it's not enough to get rid of it, but we can't trample Fukushima snail to death. We should leave the problem of the Fukushima snail to the professionals to deal with. On the other hand, the quarrel between the boys and girls about the snail also indirectly exposes the disregard for life and brutal behavior of people in today's society, which is worthy of our deep thought.