It is problematic to calculate GDP through consumption. The inflated pricing of service fees leads to inflated GDP calculated in this way. In addition, the GDP generated by finance itself does not generate value, so the GDP generated by the financial sector is also inflated. In addition, the idea that the United States prints money to buy goods from other countries is also partially included in the GDP of the United States.

Even haircuts in the United States are GDP, but enterprises below the scale in China are not.

One third of them come from world wool.

The real national strength of the United States is about ten trillion dollars! Don't overestimate!

Without strong agriculture and industry as a guarantee, the service industry is a P at a critical moment.

If the United States does not rely on printing dollars, the dollar will shrink by half in world circulation and the national GDP will also shrink by half.

There is no unified GDP calculation method and statistical content in the world. Using a GDP without a unified standard to measure a country's economic aggregate can not fully reflect a country's economic level, and using purchasing power to calculate it is relatively accurate. If the cost of services is included in a country's GDP, it will produce a false high, which is inaccurate compared with the statistical data of China's GDP. I think China's statistical method is relatively more accurate.

This dollar hegemony income can't be compared with other countries. For example, it recently returned half of Afghanistan's $7 billion deposit to others and put the other half in the United States' own pocket. What is this income called?

If you count all the lawyers who run private rental houses without a license, Chinese mainland's GDP has already surpassed that of the United States.

This is the same as stock valuation. People are valued by technology stocks and we are valued by bank stocks.