which is better for a large company with stable structure VS a small start-up company

which is better for a large company with stable structure VS a small start-up company? Small companies learn technology and big companies learn system. Whether you are in a big company or a small company, you should decide according to your own ideas. The following explains which is better: a large company with stable structure VS a small start-up company! Which is better, a large company with stable structure VS a small start-up company? 1

First, the company foundation < P > A large company with stable personnel structure: the management is standardized and the system is sound; Perfect welfare and salary system; The division of labor is clear; Systematic training and education; Emphasize teamwork and communication between teams. Moreover, it is better for large enterprises to cope with market risks than for small enterprises.

small start-up companies: they often lack a complete structure and a systematic training system; The company's development is unstable, and employees are prone to unemployment; Profits and benefits are not comparable to those of big companies.

however, entrepreneurs don't need to focus only on their own experience. In fact, more importantly, they should learn from other people's experience, take practical actions, and admit that uncertainty is also a part of the entrepreneurial process.

Second, the internal system

A large company with stable personnel structure: it has a sound system, five risks and a fixed salary. It is also stipulated to what extent it will be promoted. It works for 8 hours (with overtime pay) and its work is stable.

Start-up small companies: Generally, there are no five insurances and one gold, and sometimes I wish I could break 24 hours into 48 hours. Some companies even have capital turnover problems, and there are problems in the implementation and payment of wages.

Third, the job content

A large company with stable personnel structure: the job content is the same almost every day, just like a screw, as long as you do your job well.

Start-up small companies: Things come one after another every day, and I feel suffocated and tired in different ways. The former is mechanical work, but now it is mechanical work with clockwork, and there is not enough time every day. But speaking, the working environment is relatively free, and there are not many complicated and strict rules and procedures, especially for start-up teams, it is easier to get along with the boss.

IV. Growth space

Large companies with stable personnel structure: the division of labor leads to narrow work scope of employees, which is easy to make people feel bored and bored; On the road of career development, there will be many competitors, and it is difficult for ordinary employees to stand out there, resulting in fewer opportunities for career promotion.

Start a small company:

There will be more job opportunities; Employees hold several positions; Emphasize independent work and deal with problems; Employees will be promoted faster.

participating in the entrepreneurial process of the company from small to large can lay a personal career and economic foundation. Because of the small number of people in a small company, there are great opportunities for promotion, and you may even be entrusted with a heavy responsibility from the beginning. In a small company, everything you have is valuable and necessary, and will not be regarded as an accessory. Maybe the salary will be slightly lower, but it will be more challenging. The company expects every employee to do his best, so you will be exposed to the whole process of how to run an enterprise

. However, it should be noted that "small companies learn technology and big companies learn system." Whether you are in a big company or a small company, you should decide according to your own ideas. You know, experience is a kind of wealth. Which is better: a large company with stable structure VS a small start-up company? 2

First, a large company: the feeling of working for others will be less intense.

I know several younger bosses of startup companies, and they all have the same feature: they love to satirize migrant workers. As a boss, once it begins to expand, the typical performance is that it loves to discriminate against those who work hard to earn wages in their jobs: diss migrant workers are a sharp weapon for mentally retarded bosses to brush their sense of existence.

A, the boss of a startup company, loves to post chicken soup in a circle of friends. The theme is: Why do most people go to mediocrity from nine to five? Because they are afraid of change, they can only work for others all their lives. There is nothing wrong with chicken soup, but the question is, what will those who work for you, pay for you and make money for you think when they know that their bosses look down on them? Will you admire your boss for his high ideological level? You can only curse his high blood pressure! Because life is looked down upon and despised by the boss, it hurts more than being criticized at work.

B, the boss of a startup company, likes to share his daily routine, such as how he criticizes employees, disciplines employees, takes photos with employees and other informal occasions. He never calls employees colleagues, partners or teams, but must emphasize that they are employees under his management. You may think it's because I think too much, but I think it's an emotional intelligence problem. If I start a company as a boss, I must try to call my subordinates colleagues rather than employees, because colleagues represent "people who fight side by side" and employees represent the trading relationship of "you work for me and I pay you", which means less respect and more condescending.

the essence is to work for others, but the sense of working in big companies will be much weaker, because there is usually a perfect promotion system in big companies, and you can clearly see how to move up step by step, as long as you have the ability. But the ceiling of a small company is usually as high as the one you can see when you look up. The direct leader of a graduate may be the director, yes, you will find various directors of a small company, and then the big boss.

So, there is room for you to talk about your dreams in a big company, and maybe you can only talk about your boss's dreams in a small company.

what a big company can get is not only the salary paid on time (a small company may not be able to pay on time), but also the hidden benefits such as company endorsement, platform aura, personal background, etc. Being utilitarian, working in a big company can benefit you in many ways, while working in a small company often gives your boss more than you get.

second, big companies: the chances of being forced to be stupid will be reduced.

A post-91s boss has become a WeChat official account with hundreds of thousands of fans. The profit model is to receive advertisements and sell goods through e-commerce channels. It is not sour, and it is really worth learning from peers. It is also considered to be abandoning peers among peers, but after all, it is a very single cash mode, and the company scale is just a small workshop.

once, the post-91s boss complained in a circle of friends: "Why can't I recruit employees as hard as the Big Four?"

So you see, it's not just the post-91s employees who are arrogant, but many post-91s bosses are also more ambitious than the sky. They not only directly benchmark their fledgling selves against the Big Four bosses, but also directly benchmark the salary, development, endorsement and platform that their company can provide. Excuse me, how can you recruit employees who are as hard-working as the Big Four?

tell me another thing.

My classmate resigned with me at the same time this year. His resignation was helpless, because his mother had a heart attack and stayed in the hospital for more than half a month before she was out of danger. This made him realize that his parents were old and might be away at any time, and needed someone to take care of them. Therefore, he had to give up his dream of working hard in Shanghai and return to a small third-tier county to accompany his parents.

any normal leader will understand and support this reason, right? At least, no matter how hard you give up, you won't retain employees, will you?

However, my classmate's leadership thought is very strange. After he left his job, his leader refused to let him go. The reason is: "Even if you go home, you can't change the fact that your mother is sick." What logic, companionship can't make my mother immortal, so my companionship is meaningless?

The classmate mentioned leaving the company for three times, and said firmly that he would leave. Later, he talked to the leader in tears, and the leader let go and said that he would let people go after working for the company for another month. Without the binding of interests, the feelings between people are fragile.

In the workplace, you are not afraid of hardship and fatigue, but you are afraid of being forced to have a position. I have heard many reasons for resigning, and there is always one: my XX is stupid.

It's not that big companies don't have these people, but there are three characteristics in the selection of candidates in big companies: high standards, high threshold and great competition, so there is naturally a stupid filter. Colleagues who work with you are generally of high comprehensive quality, while it is difficult for small companies to recruit people, so there is always stupidity in escaping from the net. A big company with 11111 people may have 1111 people who are stupid, and a small company with 111 people may have 51 people who are stupid. Who do you choose?

third, large companies: promises are usually not breached.

when I left my job, I went to withdraw the provident fund, and found that although I stayed for less than a year, there were tens of thousands of provident funds. The former company never treated employees badly in terms of five insurances and one gold. But in the provident fund management center, I met several people, because the company did not pay social security, and came to consult how to protect rights.

please note that paying social security to employees is an obligation of an enterprise stipulated by law, not a welfare policy for employees. Large companies usually don't take the risk of public opinion and don't pay social security to their employees, but it is common for small companies to bully employees into not paying them in order to save money.

A reader cried to me. Before she resigned and went to Beipiao, she interviewed a small company, and first sent a portfolio to HR, who vowed that she would definitely pass, so she encouraged her to resign. After arriving in Beijing, HR changed her mind and said that the quality of her works was not high enough and her experience was not enough. She also attacked her with rude words: At your level, it is basically impossible to find a job in Beijing. Don't think highly of yourself.

she asked if the company had paid five insurances and one gold, because she wanted to buy a house in Beijing. HR not only justifiably refused to pay, but also hit her: With you, buy a house in Beijing? How big is your heart? The final salary is only 4,111 yuan a month, which is the same as her salary in third-tier cities.

what can I do? I quit my old job. Although I was not considerate myself, HR is most shameless for breaking faith. Her ability may not be enough, but it is hard to imagine that a formal big company will have HR to communicate with candidates in a blow-up and insulting way.

finally.

The choice between big companies and small companies can't be decided by one size fits all. Some people eat and die in big companies, while others grow at a high speed in small companies. Some people hate making screws in big companies, while others have no choice but to do everything in small companies. There is no standard answer, but if you must give a better answer, I suggest you go to a big company if you have a choice. It is much easier to go from a big company to a small company, but it is difficult on the contrary.

Although big companies have high salaries, good benefits, large platforms and good prospects, but ... Don't be buts, the previous conditions have been met, but what is it, but are you afraid that you can't stand the stimulation of money and forget your initial heart? Large companies can definitely give you one or more of the above, but it is really difficult for small companies.

so, small companies can't go at all? Of course not.

I agree with a netizen in Zhihu that professionalism is very important regardless of the size of the company. Small and beautiful companies can also be more professional than big companies in a certain field, so if you want to go to a small company, please try to consider whether the company is professional in a certain field in addition to salary, which means whether the company's prospects are broad and your personal development is stable.

to go to a small company, I think the best situation is: being a boss who is not stupid and becoming a partner of a small company are the best choices in terms of ability training and potential benefits. Of course, you have to be good enough to make a choice.

Finally, give yourself a step:

Li Xiaolang is so clear. If he starts a small company in the future, he won't be silly to force the boss, right? hahaha.