The significance of replay is: through replay we can avoid repeating mistakes; in the replay process to understand the team's strengths and weaknesses, so that the division of labor becomes more reasonable, so that the next step in the development of the ability to achieve clearer goals; to master the direction of things frustrated and triggers, to better grasp the rhythm of development; to know the better possibilities in where to grasp the details. The benefits of review: look at the problem from the subjective to the objective, to have a global mindset, not overly confined to the details, open up the mind, a problem not only one answer. It turns out that interpersonal interactions, too, can produce compound interest. I have joined a lot of quality groups, looking back but it seems to miss many things and people. Review, really can have the characteristics of awesome people, today began to think about and practice the matter of review.

1. Whether the review is the same as the work summary:

Many people will be mixed with the work summary review, in fact, there is a big difference between the two. Review is to allow individuals and teams to learn from the experience just past, so there must be a suitable atmosphere and mechanism for learning, including faithfully restore the facts, analyze the differences with an open mind, reflect on the self, learn the experience or lessons learned, find the future can be improved, and explore a more perfect solution. It is important to follow certain processes and steps, and then follow a certain framework for reviewing and summarizing things. The review process is non-critical, non-commendatory, faithfully stating facts, and learning-oriented. And the general work summary does not have the above requirements.

2. Review template is reasonable for the following reasons:

(1) there is a strict goal-oriented, established to make reasoning, judgment of the *** with the yardstick is pre-established "goal". There is no *** with the yardstick, it will be "public reasoning, the mother-in-law said that the woman has a reason", into the quarrel, it is difficult to form *** with the cognition.

(2) Positive and negative feedback are strictly separated, the facts, reasons, laws and initiatives strictly step by step. This makes it easier to be objective, fair, comprehensive, and not heavy. In reality, the overall success of things, we tend to be immersed in the joy of victory, ignoring which there are Lowlights, there are also worthy of lessons learned to improve the point. In the case of overall failure, we tend to be immersed in the emotions of failure, ignoring the Highlights. in the presentation of the facts, many people will be along a certain point of fact, prematurely plunged into the cause of the analysis and summary of experience, and forget the whole picture. It is possible to restore all the facts and then realize that the reasons are completely different. Lenovo Star's review template is formatted in such a way that it reminds you to focus on only one of the aspects at each stage, and also reminds you not to leave out the others, so that you can be objective, fair, and comprehensive.

(3) Landing on the law summary and action initiatives, which is the embodiment of result orientation. Ultimately need to form cognitive refreshing or practical action, so that it can be landed on the ground, and really have an effect on the organization's growth and future performance.