Epidemic sealed the city, the store does not necessarily not let business after all, people living in the city or need to live a normal life In addition, even if it is sealed the city, then also still need to look at the city of the severity of the epidemic, as well as the nature of the store will have an impact on the nature of the epidemic, some of the crowded may not be open for business during the epidemic.

: Due to the impact of the epidemic or a new crown patients lead to the closure of the business. By the government and relevant departments require catering enterprises to close or suspend business, resulting in catering enterprises can not operate normally, then the catering enterprises can claim that the epidemic is force majeure, require the application of force majeure statutory exemption system, requesting exemption from the epidemic prevention and control period of the rent.

If the epidemic causes the catering enterprise to possess and use the leased property to bring about a serious decline in the revenue right energy benefits, the contract will continue to fulfill the lessee is obviously unfair, then the catering enterprise can claim that the epidemic constitutes a change of circumstances, the court according to the principle of fairness, discretionary relief of the rent during the epidemic.

By the epidemic, the store was required by the lessor to close, suspend business or shorten the normal business hours, resulting in the normal business of the restaurant, the restaurant business can claim that due to the lessor's reasons lead to the lessee can not normal use of the leased property and thus require a reduction in the period of closure of the rent, or even compensation for the losses during the period of closure.