we all say that old employees are treasures, and those who leave their jobs are treasures! Not only being familiar with the company's system and process, but also knowing the internal culture and routines can save the cost of induction training and communication.

However, is it risk-free for employees who leave their jobs to be re-employed? What should our HR friends pay attention to? Why did you leave in the first place

this is crucial! Take the initiative to walk or be forced to walk, take the initiative to walk because of what? Low salary, interpersonal relationship, bullying by superiors or conflict of values, professional ethics, etc.

If you are in conflict of values and professional ethics, you don't need to consider re-employment. If it weren't for this problem, we should pay attention to whether the reason why he left at that time has been solved. If it is not solved, there is a high probability that he will leave again. What is your ability and past performance?

whether we re-employ former employees or recruit new employees, the demand for competency matching is still the core issue that our employers are most concerned about. Therefore, we need to have relevant data to compare the past ability and performance of personnel. Why come now?

generally, everyone says that "a good horse never turns back", so why does a person leave and come back?

why do you say this? Because there are indeed many people in practical work who have bad motives, steal technical secrets or business secrets, or do things out of revenge. Therefore, as HR workers or employing departments, we must do a good job in this identification. Compliance of re-employment process

In fact, many HR friends in the company don't pay much attention to this issue. After all, the elderly don't have to interview again, and there is no probation period. People often ignore the compliance of normal processes. However, it often poses risks. Obligation to inform employees' benefits

For example, is the calculation of employees' length of service cumulative? Whether you can directly enjoy some company allowances and so on.

make it clear, and don't cause conflicts between the two sides!