Many times when you eat in a restaurant, you will encounter some "compulsory" behaviors taken by some restaurants, which will make you uncomfortable in your heart. For example, for some restaurants with hot business, the number of private rooms is relatively limited. Sometimes, in order to get higher profits as much as possible, they often have clear restrictions on guests' use of private rooms, requiring that guests who eat will be forced to spend a certain amount before they can use private rooms. Although merchants open stores to make money, and they are their own private rooms, it is understandable that they want to make their own regulations. But for me, this is a bad experience, so in this case, I am often reluctant to choose to eat in such a restaurant, because I also have my own choice. In addition, in the process of dining, many restaurants often force each person to charge a service fee of about 11 yuan according to the number of people who eat. In fact, I personally think that if this restaurant can provide excellent service different from most other restaurants, I also recognize it. However, if I say that I have not received any obvious service after spending this service fee, then I think this compulsion of the merchants is completely a kind of extortion. Is it necessary to ask the waiters to bring their own tableware or ask the waiters? ! For such a business, as long as I have experienced it once, I will definitely not go there for the second time, because this kind of behavior of the business seems to make me get a small benefit, but it hurts my reputation, which is totally not worth the candle.

I really haven't encountered coercion, but I have seen that my solution to this problem is to suggest complaining directly or using laws to protect myself. Under the background of modern society, merchants have forgotten that customers are God's, and this service concept has turned into their own grandfathers. First, the catering industry has imposed a "tea fee", and consumers have a contractual relationship with food and beverage outlets based on consumption. The contractual relationship should be based on the freedom of contract, and consumption originates from demand. Consumers can choose whether to buy tea or accept the service of "tea place" independently. Under the premise that consumers have no demand, food and beverage outlets force consumers to buy tea, even if they don't drink tea, they have to pay, which completely limits and deprives consumers of their right to choose independently and trade fairly. Second, the "overlord clause" in the format contract When consumers apply for various membership cards, sign subscription books and service contracts, operators often sign clauses for consumers, which are drawn up in advance by them and not negotiated with consumers when concluding contracts. "The power of interpretation belongs to the operator" is precisely that the operator takes advantage of its dominant position in the market, which violates the principle of fair trading and limits the rights and methods of consumers to interpret the contract. The content of this clause is invalid, and it cannot be exempted from the legal responsibility that the operator should bear by seizing the power of interpretation. Third, restaurants are forced to "scan the code" to order food. When consumers go to restaurants, some restaurants do not provide manual ordering or even on-site menus. Consumers can only "scan the code to order food" after paying attention to WeChat official account or applets. Because of the complexity of smart phone operation, scanning code for ordering food is not universal. The elderly and minors often need the assistance of others to complete the order scanning process, and there may be problems such as personal information disclosure and even payment security behind the "code scanning".