1: concrete analysis of specific problems:
First of all, I think the first point is very simple, that is, concrete analysis of specific problems. We can't generalize. A problem cannot be explained from its own perspective. We must think about such a problem from the perspective of others and ourselves in order to find the most reasonable explanation. For example, the box fee. If there are many people in this restaurant and some people want to go to the box for dinner, then we really should pay part of the box fee, because many people are competing and they want to go, so I think it is normal to pay part of the box fee at this time.
2. If there is no one, there is no need:
But let's look at it from another angle. If there is no one in this restaurant at all, we want to eat in the environment inside the box at this time. Maybe you have air conditioning, so we will be more comfortable now. We are also here for consumption, and no one has caused any trouble to this restaurant. I don't think we should pay the box fee at this time. If it is still a box fee at this time, I think it is illegal, because there is no competition with us at all. We just come here to enjoy better service, and we also spend money.
So generally speaking, if the local restaurant is empty or the business is very bad, we should not charge any fees for going to the box. But if there are many people inside, the business of the store is better at this time. We were forced to eat in the box, and other guests wanted to eat in the box. At this time, there will be competition. If we are forced to go, we really should bear part of the box fee. I think this is understandable, but both sides should communicate more. I think this problem is easy to solve and not contradictory.