The first is not true: the pay of the deliveryman is not so little

The pay of the deliveryman of the major platforms is still quite transparent, even if the negative buffs such as newcomers, newcomers, fewer orders, etc. are all stacked on top of each other, and the three or four thousand a month is enough to eat is surely still not a problem. Not to say that the hungry must steal food.

As a takeaway, it's easy to know which meals are cheaper, and it's possible to "not eat well" and "not eat enough". Even in a first-tier city like Beijing, there are 15 yuan to eat fast food (in the East Third Ring Road, the Golden Rice Bowl). Lower the demand for pancakes, dunking cake can certainly be eaten.

The second is not true: the two people's cooperation is too skilled

From the video, the takeaway brother lock the car into the building, the wife immediately get off the car and follow into the building to observe each other's dynamics, and then give the husband a signal. The latter less than 5 seconds to complete the transfer of takeout, directly start the car to walk and wait for his wife to jump on the back seat.

This set of line of flow, if not for the monitoring simply can not find people. There is reason to believe that there was at least discussion and premeditation, and probably not the first time they cooperated.

The third untruth: restaurant owners are not that indifferent

In fact, many restaurants treat riders very favorably, because they are also worried that the order is not picked up, placed to become refunded. In the summer there is free drinking water, in winter you can enter the door to heat the water and so on. There are also many restaurants have "love meal", difficult not to spend money can eat a bowl of noodles and so on.

While not all restaurant owners are so enthusiastic, but if you are in a difficult situation, can not even eat, and take delivery of the boss of the good words to ask, not so much to give a portion of rice can not. Not so much as being a rider in a big city and not being able to afford to eat.

From all of the above, "late at night did not eat" may be true, "really hungry" is most likely to be sophomoric. Really late at night without eating, less earn an order or two, early to buy food home to eat and then out. At least don't steal from fellow travelers ah, but also from other people's car seat inside the direct take.

You go to the restaurant to pick up the food place, ask the boss said there is no do more than one or the guests return the single do not want, most likely to ask a few bosses to give you. (Often there is no rider to pick up the single or the guests cancel the waste single) and your station manager said the other side will give you a way out.

At least in this case, it feels like the couple delivering the takeout is not so much, but also more borrowed from the social mood.

Now our society is more humane, we will be more caring to the bottom of the people. Just because the society "can not afford to eat, to the police station, someone first to the hot meal" and other positive things more, instinctive crime after the first to package themselves as vulnerable groups.

The so-called "gentleman can be deceived party."

And the delivery boy trunk is not locked, also because of the belief that society "no one will be so low as to steal the rider's takeout", overestimated the human nature.

Such a person should be left with a record of credibility and not be allowed to engage in any service industry, especially the catering industry, which is highly related to health and integrity. At most, they should be engaged in some manual labor so that they can't get into big problems