According to Article 26 of the Consumer Rights and Interests Protection Law, that is, "Operators shall not, by means of form terms, notices, declarations, store notices, etc., make provisions that exclude or restrict the rights of consumers, reduce or exempt the responsibilities of operators, or aggravate the liabilities of consumers, which are unfair and unreasonable to consumers, and shall not utilize the form terms and make use of the technological means to compel transactions." Article 9 of the Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interests clearly stipulates: "Consumers have the right to choose goods or services on their own. Consumers have the right to independently choose the operators who provide goods or services, independently choose the varieties of goods or services, and independently decide to buy or not to buy any kind of goods, and accept or not to accept any kind of service."

The establishment of the "no foreign food" rule belongs to the use of monopoly status and the establishment of the hegemony of the provisions of this additional obligations imposed on one side of the practice is in fact legally invalid.