Not having children?

How bad must a person's morality be to persuade the poor to have children? I have always believed that there are only two reasons for most of the sufferings of the young people at the bottom of China:

There are many people.

Before, when I was recruiting people in my last company, I put in more than 100 resumes in a graphic design position with a salary of 7-8K, and finally I chose an excellent master 2 1 1 with a monthly salary of more than 7,000. At the same time, housing prices in the core area of Suzhou have been flat.

It's 0/2 o'clock in the evening/kloc-and I suddenly have abdominal pain. I ordered the medicine, and someone will deliver it to my door in ten minutes.

In the past, poor people could only use bowls and chopsticks to give birth to children. I started herding cattle at the age of seven or eight, worked in the fields in my teens, and went out to work in my teens. They didn't expect much success. In short, it belongs to low input, high income and high return.

But in this era, the children of the poor have no land to grow, and the division of labor through the education system (different majors) has become a screw in all walks of life. In the trap of capitalization, our generation has rolled up a simple administrative post in state-owned enterprises in all walks of life and needs a master who graduated from 1985 to do it. Is it necessary to use high numbers in organizing activities?

The score line of postgraduate entrance examination has been continuously improved, and I desperately went ashore for postgraduate entrance examination. After work, I found myself still rolling around in my basic position.

The greatest kindness of our generation of poor people to this society and ourselves is to have fewer children or even no children.

For the younger generation, if they contribute less to the rolling wage earners, the resources allocated to everyone will not be so tight, and capitalists will no longer pursue "if you don't do it, someone will do it!" Don't let our selfishness ruin the well-being of the next generation.

For myself, I think the vast majority of poor people don't need genetics. In today's society, it is a great relief to take care of yourself and not die suddenly because of overtime.

For society, a crazy involution society is deformed in essence, and it is a disrespect for people's intelligence, hard work and value under the condition of limited and unfair resource allocation. Having fewer children makes society less entangled, which is also a defense of human values.

As for the bourgeoisie, I suggest having more children. After all, the efficiency of a person's spending money is limited, and having more children is conducive to promoting social consumption.