The person in charge of the store did have some management negligence, as 477 guests entered the store without scanning the code to register. In many service industries, if customers find it too much of a hassle, they are likely to lose some of their loyal customers. Although the person in charge of the store didn't let all the consumers scan the code to register, the person in charge shouldn't be held responsible for the spread of the epidemic. In Beijing, 11 new cases of coronary artery disease have been reported in one roast duck restaurant. Is there negligence on the part of the people in charge of the restaurant? After the investigation, it was found that 477 people who entered the restaurant had not scanned the code to register. From this number of people who had not swept the code to register, it can be seen that the relevant person in charge of the duck restaurant did have some management negligence.

Two, but as a service industry, if the guests feel too much trouble, will lose a lot of guests

We all know that the restaurant is a service industry, as a service industry, if the customers feel that entering the store to consume especially troublesome, then the store will certainly lose a lot of customers. Although the relevant person in charge of this roast duck restaurant has management negligence, but they also have no choice, after all, during the epidemic, they also need to open the door to do business, also need customers.

Three, the occurrence of this gathering of the epidemic, should not be by the roast duck restaurant in charge of the responsibility

Beijing this time the emergence of 11 infected cases, although broke the rhythm of Beijing's epidemic prevention, but the emergence of these 11 infected cases is unpredictable. The people in charge of the duck restaurant should not be held responsible for this cluster of cases, because the people in charge of the duck restaurant did not want an outbreak in their establishment either.

So do you think the people in charge of this roast duck restaurant were negligent in their management? Feel free to leave a comment below in the comments section.