1. will not review, equal to do things only half done

2. do not do review, you will miss the opportunity to become a professional

3. review can let us not in the same place to fall

do not do review with the passage of time, will forget here once made mistakes, the next time will still be a problem in these parts! The event reputation will not go straight up, will miss a lot of opportunities to summarize from the practice. I can only say how many events I've done, but I can't say I'm an expert in this area.

I like the saying that review is the process of turning experience into ability. Similarly, by not doing replays, you miss the opportunity to become a professional.

2, good review is reproducible and can be manipulated specifically from five aspects of a comprehensive summary

1 process review

1 event most people can see the problem is that the process of articulation smooth or not, off the bus do not know how to go to the venue, to the venue do not know how to sign in, signing in the end of the no one guide where the seat in the seat to sit down on the seat there is no thing can be done. Can only do dry waiting, the opening do not know what is the process host did not introduce, etc., which of the above links are not well thought out will reduce the user's experience. In the process of review can be considered from two structures:

The first: according to the timeline to review, before the event, during the event, after the event, respectively, to review the highlights as well as can be optimized point.

The second type: according to the functional division of the review, design group, material group, content group, host promotion group, each group highlights, and can be optimized.

If there is a problem, you can use this structure

1) the original expectations

2) the actual situation

3) cause analysis: analyze what went wrong

4) the opinion of improvement: that is, the next step

If you build a good framework for reviewing the activities before the start, and find problems at any time to fill in the each category, you can quickly iterate, and if it's a few days' worth of activities, you can review and optimize the next day's content every night. After the event and then the overall review.

2 ability to review

1 position is done well, it must be that this person has the ability needed for this position, if not it may lead to the link quality is not high. For example, the host is not good enough to look pretty, Mandarin does not require a particular standard, but must be able to make people listen without difficulty, can control the overall style of the program, control the process of the program. If you arrange an inappropriate person in a certain position, the probability is that you will become a fire-fighter, putting out fires everywhere. So, you need to set up the job duties and requirements for each segment, and based on that, evaluate whether the person you put in the position is capable of doing the job or not. The two commonly used assessment dimensions are attitude and competence.

3 Cost Review

Actually, there are two main dimensions: the efficiency of the work and the actual money spent.

The first dimension: the efficiency of the work

The work can be divided into the specific workload of the work and the work that can produce value.

Work that is specific to the amount of work is similar to sending a courier or counting materials, which is easy but labor-intensive and time-consuming.

The work that can produce value includes the work of negotiating venue cooperation resources, promotion and public relations, and other technical work.

In the absence of knowledge you use a very capable person to do the workload of things, it is a huge waste of resources. On the flip side the person who will business negotiation to find the venue resources may be done in a day, you find a will not negotiate the negotiation efficiency is naturally much slower.

The second dimension: the actual money spent

The actual money spent should be a sum of statistics, and finally categorized and summarized accounting ratio.

To compare with the budget which part of the excess? What is the reason for the excess? Is it by chance or unreasonable budget? Constant rationalization of the budget program. Also on this basis, ask yourself whether you have thought of some ways to achieve results without spending money or less money.

4Resource Review

1 activity down to the contact with the resources do not do any archiving records inventory, until the next time the need for these resources and have to go back to find. That's a shame.

We can build a resource library. With these resources should be categorized to do the record, the people who have cooperated with the record of how the level, how the attitude. Then we can record it and use it next time.

5 personal review

In a fast-growing team, if personal growth is too slow to keep up with the pace of the team, then as a team leader should be how to deal with? It should be timely for team members to do a personal review, so that they continue to find that they can do better, and constantly optimize.

To share with you a common way to review

1) Describe the overall event: to give an overall subjective characterization, this thing is doing well or not good enough.

2) Analyze the problem: list the causes

of this subjective characterization.

3) Solution: a solution that you think is more reasonable

4) Inspiration: some good inspirations that come to mind during the whole event.

Personal review is finished does not mean that the review is over? Here to tell you an important detail, there must be experienced seniors to take with them to amend, review whether the objective is true, whether the direction of improvement is correctly enforceable this text step is particularly important, because many newcomers look at the problem from the point of view.