I think this matter needs the intervention of the relevant departments, but a principal is crying because he can't change a food delivery company. The reason behind it is that the food delivery company was determined by the education department through bidding and there is nothing he can do.

From the principal's crying behavior, I can see that the principal is really helpless about this matter. At the same time, I can see that the principal's heart is very tangled and complicated. It may be necessary to change the food delivery company according to the principal's personal wishes, but he can't change a food delivery company by himself, so he can only cry helplessly. I think the problems involved in this matter are beyond the principal's personal handling authority. It is really necessary for the relevant departments to intervene in the investigation to see what the Education Bureau has undertaken in this process.

1. This matter should be thoroughly investigated.

I don't think a principal has the right to change a food delivery company, and the problems involved are probably beyond the principal's power. According to what the principal said, the food delivery company is determined by the education bureau, then this matter is likely to have a lot to do with the bidding of the education bureau. It should be that someone with greater power than the principal is helping this food delivery company to maintain this food delivery company.

second, change the food delivery company as soon as possible.

I think this incident is actually very bad in nature, and there was a collective poisoning and vomiting incident when delivering food to children. In the course of this incident, it shows that there are great problems in the quality of the food, and there are major security risks in the whole process of delivering food, delivering food and making meals. If this incident is ignored, it is likely to cause a collective food poisoning incident again. The food delivery company will be replaced in time and food poisoning will be seriously investigated.

Third, the biggest hidden story behind it comes from the Education Bureau.

I think it is very unreasonable that the campus principal has no way to control whether a food delivery company is replaced. I think that the quality of food delivery is good or bad, and whether the food delivery company can meet the standards recognized by the school, the campus principal should have the right to speak. Even if a collective tender is conducted through the Education Bureau, it cannot be assumed for a long time that as long as the tender is passed, no matter how to deliver food to children, the principal has no way to manage it. This is completely wrong. Even if it is a formal qualified food delivery company that meets the tender requirements, it should also meet the health and safety as the primary factor. The campus principal has the right to supervise and suggest the food delivery company. When such problems occur in the food delivery company, the principal should have the right to stop the food delivery company from delivering food.