First, it was reported that Lenovo received a rebate of $22 million from Intel in the third quarter of this fiscal year, but the quarterly financial report did not mention this expense and directly included it in the profit; Secondly, Lenovo's internationalization has encountered a cold current, and it is possible to lay off 1000 people worldwide in the near future; Third, Lenovo spent a lot of money on advertising around the world as the Olympic Games approached, but its business volume did not keep pace with brand building. Fourth, Lenovo Group may also get huge kickbacks from amd according to the unspoken rules of international chip manufacturers.
No matter how to analyze and interpret it, Lenovo's current capital chain is quite tight, so the real estate business has become Lenovo's cash machine. Therefore, under this background, Kerong Tiancheng, invested and built by Lenovo Group in Wuhan, may have greater pressure of return and produce some unrealistic requirements. In addition, Lenovo Group is still in the running-in stage of real estate, so Kerong Tiancheng has more reason not to be optimistic about Wuhan real estate market.
2. If the eavesdropping is true, it is a violation of the privileges and immunities enjoyed by the United Nations and its personnel. According to the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations (1946), offices, archives and documents owned or held by the United Nations are inviolable; Oral or written statements and acts made by United Nations officials in the performance of their duties enjoy immunity from legal process. The legal procedures here include investigation procedures, including monitoring. The eavesdropping behavior of British intelligence personnel, if true, is actually a monitoring investigation procedure. Therefore, without giving up its privileges and immunities, this kind of behavior clearly violates international law.
According to Article 100 of the Charter of the United Nations, Member States of the United Nations undertake to respect the exclusive international nature of the duties of the Secretary-General and staff members and never try to influence their duties. If the eavesdropping behavior of British intelligence personnel is inspired by the British government, according to the principle of imputation of state responsibility in international law, the British government should bear state responsibility for this behavior.
Eckhard said that the Agreement on United Nations Clubs signed by the United Nations and the United States in 1947 stipulates that the United States government has the obligation to protect the United Nations headquarters in the United States from illegal investigation.
The agreement between the United Nations and the United States on the United Nations Club is one of the supplements to Convention 1946. As the headquarters of the United Nations, the United States should not only fulfill its obligations as a Member State, but also respect the privileges and immunities of the United Nations and its officials. But also to fulfill the specific protection obligations stipulated in the agreement. If the U.S. government fails to fulfill its protection obligations, or even participates in such eavesdropping, it is a violation of international law and should bear the national responsibility in international law.
Fan Paopao, a teacher who left his students for his life during the earthquake and later publicly defended himself, was strongly condemned by many people, and some even called for his expulsion from the teaching staff. However, some people choose a tolerant attitude towards "Fan Paopao". However, the endless debate on the moral level masks a more important question: how to deal with the "Fan Paopao" who tells the truth?
Many times, it is actually difficult for people to tell the truth. Especially when the truth itself conflicts with the dominant moral standards in society, it is absolutely necessary to have the courage to tell the truth beyond ordinary people. What's more, in a certain period, in a certain society, telling the truth will cost you your life. We must admit that daring to tell the truth is a rare quality-no matter whether people with this quality are "good" or "bad".
When people are afraid to tell the truth, especially the "negative" truth, society is in a stagnant state, full of big talk, empty talk and rhetoric. Once the Hobbesian jungle of "everyone fights" is formed in the ideological and moral field, "telling the truth" will appear "stupid and naive" or "crazy and shameless". In this way, it will lead to such a bad result-because you can't hear the truth, you can't find the real problem, let alone the correct solution. "Officialdom" prevails, and many problems dare not be exposed, so it can't be solved. Isn't it the same thing?
In view of this, we should maintain a rational and peaceful attitude, treat and analyze "Fan Paopao" correctly, and try to find out the real problems hidden behind moral topics. For "Fan Paopao", we must first understand the following truth: the lack of disaster emergency drills is the root cause of "Fan Paopao"-this is what we really need to solve and what we can really solve (a relatively abstract moral standard problem). Therefore, we should thank "Fan Paopao" for telling the truth, for letting us see human instinct through analyzing ourselves, and for providing us with a case of social transformation.
It can be said that "Fan Paopao" may have made some mistakes, but those who abuse "Fan Paopao" are adding to their difficulties. In fact, a truly scientific and rational society must protect the free expression of "Fan Paopao" to encourage them to tell the truth, so as to better help solve practical problems, instead of burying the truth in the depths of the moral "Leifeng Tower". In this regard, we obviously need more profound reflection.