I feel that the boss's actions are a little extreme, but they are very correct. Although there is a saying that dogs are loyal friends of human beings. However, when taking the dog out, it must be divided into occasions, such as the dining table, where the dog must not go up. Without any prejudice, just considering the issues of hygiene and public space, the boss's approach is very wise.

According to related news reports, this happened in a restaurant in Guanghan, Sichuan. A puppy is standing on a chair, eating at the dining table aboveboard, and there is nothing strange about the people at the same table, as if it is a common thing for a puppy to eat at the dining table.

The owner of the restaurant quickly discovered the strangeness of the customers at this table, and directly came over to the customers and said:? Dogs can't serve on the table? But the customer didn't listen at all and had an argument with the boss. The boss was also very angry and threw away the tableware used by the dog on the spot, leaving nothing.

After this video was posted on the Internet, friends unanimously agreed with the boss's practice and commented: Disposing of tableware on the spot can eliminate other diners' concerns about hygiene, which is no problem. ? This boss is good. Some practitioners always like to make peace when they encounter such a thing. It's really a high-ranking judgment. ? It's immoral to keep a dog like this. Support the shopkeeper. ?

To tell the truth, it is not wrong for dog lovers to keep dogs, but it is a big mistake to treat their dogs too much as treasures. There are a lot of microorganisms and bacteria in daily life. Even after careful cleaning, there will still be residues on the dog's body. It is very unsanitary to let the dog use the tableware, which is likely to cause bacterial infection and has certain hidden dangers to the food safety of the diners.

On the other hand, dogs are too lively and their behavior is extremely uncontrollable. In public places, it is forbidden to bring dogs in. Therefore, the dog owner's dog is not only very unsanitary, but also very incompetent.

from any point of view, the store owner's approach is correct to the extreme.