The two review schools themselves have no comparative value, are the traditional teaching model of the school, to put it simply, are the traditional senior classroom moved outside the school, a change of place, the teacher is indeed responsible for, but a lot of them are part-time teachers. For them, school for many years, profit-oriented, this is no excuse, after all, we are not engaged in public welfare. But as a repeat student, to what, is it will be the same pattern of senior year, and then a year? Obviously not, repeat the most important thing is to change, not only the environment to change, thinking to change, the model should also change, unchanged is the same old place, no enhancement can be said.

Repeat is to seek a breakthrough in the predicament, in the innovative mode of teaching to seek to expand the subject thinking. If nothing changes, what is the point of repeating. The first thing you need to do is to ask what the qualifications of the school, the qualifications of the teachers, the school food is good, the dormitory is good, these are false, these are also to amortize the cost of the school. The cost of who is going to pay, obviously the parents to pay.

Good schools always look at whether the teacher is full-time, the teacher is not able to do full-time accompaniment, the teacher has no education and parenting connotation. The principal has no unique teaching philosophy