Why did such a small restaurant cause 17 deaths? The restaurant is on the first floor. After the fire broke out, the people in the restaurant should be able to evacuate quickly. Why

Why would there be such a major death? I can't imagine the scene without seeing the photos, and I can't feel the great despair of the people who were in the fire at that time! 17 people died, which constitutes a major production safety accident according to the classification rules of safety accidents, second only to a particularly serious accident. The person in charge

has been suspected of the crime of responsibility for major safety accidents, and the maximum penalty is 7 years' imprisonment. If someone commits arson, the arsonist is likely to be sentenced to death < P >.

1. Based on the results of on-site inspection and inquiry, we finally concluded that the fire was actually a fire deflagration. The aging of the kitchen liquefied gas hose led to the cracking, which led to the leakage of liquefied gas. After mixing with air, it deflagrated and caused an accident. Fortunately, the liquefied gas tank didn't explode directly, otherwise I'm afraid I can't investigate at my level.

It's so sad that 17 runners can't get away, waiting for the investigation results.

In recent years, there have been frequent safety accidents. I don't know whether it is poor supervision or loopholes. In short, everyone doesn't want to see this situation. I hope the relevant departments

will strengthen supervision and enhance the fire safety awareness of merchants, and some fire competitions can be held to reward those who perform well.

Anyway, people's lives are greater than others. This restaurant is not small. It's normal to have 21 or 31 people with employees and diners. I wonder how this restaurant on the first floor facing the street can trap people.

second, if it is not intentional arson and murder, it is certain that the hotel legal person will enter, and the person directly responsible for the fire safety inspection is estimated to be unable to escape, and it is estimated that the head of the district fire prevention will be replaced. Why don't you control the accident before it happens? Can you control the legal person after the accident to revive the dead and restore the broken

family? This restaurant is not small, and it's normal for employees to bring diners to 21 or 31 people. I wonder how this restaurant on the first floor facing the street can

trap people. It's so pitiful that 17 innocent lives are lost in the meal. How sad their families should be, how sad they don't know what happened, what kind of fire they have, and they don't even have time to run for their lives. Any business premises must strictly abide by the relevant regulations, and must ensure the safety of customers, hoping that the alarm will ring and the tragedy will never happen again.

A fire in such a roadside restaurant during normal business hours during the day can cause so many casualties. The most reasonable explanation is that there has been at least one explosion or deflagration. In the layout of this small restaurant, there are generally at least two exits, including the main entrance, and the kitchen usually has a back door as the other exit. During normal business hours, regardless of whether other safety exits can be opened, at least the main entrance of the restaurant will not be closed. According to the development speed of the fire in the restaurant, even if the restaurant is full, all or at least most people should be evacuated within 2 to 3 minutes after the fire is found, because all the people in the restaurant are awake during this period, and even if they drink, there is no situation that 17 people are unable to evacuate.

3. So the only reasonable explanation is that an incident that can cause large-scale injuries occurred in a short time before most people could leave. About 2116, I investigated a fire accident in a ramen noodle restaurant: the accident happened at about 5: 11 in the morning. The noodle restaurant was a street shop with two floors. After I arrived, another investigator and I found that the glass in the shop was broken to varying degrees, and most of the decoration in the shop had traces of smoke. The traces of fire spread were not serious. Several employees working in the store had slight burns and concussions to varying degrees, which made them unable to recall the accident that day. One of them broke his bones because of jumping from the second floor.

after the scene of the accident was inspected, we found a rubber hose of liquefied gas tank with a crack in the kitchen with a slight trace of fire spread. There was no trace of fire and mechanical damage in the whole hose, so we focused on the leakage of liquefied gas. Later, after the injured person was in stable condition, through inquiry, the liquefied gas hose had never been replaced or inspected for many years. Before the incident, the kitchen was preparing to cook noodle soup that day, but the staff in the store did not see the fire spread, but suddenly felt a heat wave.

on the other hand, according to the past work experience, the energy used by such restaurants is generally natural gas, liquefied gas or fuel ethanol, and among them, liquefied gas seems to be the most cost-effective one and has been widely used. In addition, the restaurant is small in scale, and the kitchen space is relatively closed. Once liquefied gas leaks, it will gather in a short time, which will quickly increase the concentration of liquefied gas in the unit space. The kitchen lampblack is heavy, and even if it leaks a lot, it is not easy for people to distinguish by smell. Once it reaches the explosion limit, any fire source may cause deflagration or explosion. Therefore, the fire in this restaurant in Changchun can cause such heavy casualties. At present, I can only think that there was a deflagration or explosion in the restaurant, otherwise I can't explain it.

a particularly serious accident refers to an accident that killed more than 31 people, or seriously injured more than 1,111 people, including acute industrial poisoning, the same below, or caused direct economic losses of more than 1 billion yuan. A major accident refers to an accident that killed more than 11 people and less than 31 people, or seriously injured more than 51 people and less than 1,111 people, or caused direct economic losses of more than 51 million yuan and less than 1 billion yuan. A major accident refers to an accident that causes more than 3 people to die but less than 11 people, or more than 11 people but less than 51 people to be seriously injured, or more than 11 million yuan but less than 51 million yuan to cause direct economic losses.