What legal responsibilities do catering enterprises need to bear?

Legal responsibilities of a restaurant

What legal responsibilities do catering enterprises need to bear are reasonable and legal, and the laws and regulations to be followed are as follows: Food Law, Food Hygiene Law, Food Safety Law, Regulations for the Implementation of Food Safety Law, and Food Safety Supervision and Management Measures for Catering Services;

food safety operating rules for catering services, Law of the People's Republic of China on the Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products

Law of the People's Republic of China on the Quality of Products, Measures for the Administration of Catering Service Licensing

What legal responsibilities should the restaurant manager pay if employees are abused by guests in the restaurant? Hello, it has nothing to do with the restaurant manager that restaurant employees are abused. If this is the service industry you choose, as long as it is not. The manager will be condemned morally, but it has little to do with the legal responsibility.

The legal responsibility for the loss of vehicles in front of the hotel is based on the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests

Article 7 Consumers have the right to protect their personal and property safety when purchasing and using goods and receiving services.

consumers have the right to demand that the goods and services provided by business operators meet the requirements of protecting personal and property safety.

you can ask the hotel to bear legal responsibility.

However, there is a premise that the place where you put your car belongs to the business scope of the hotel. If it is not a parking spot provided by the hotel or a place that the hotel can control, the hotel has no guarantee obligation.

the fault requirements of the paid custody contract and the unpaid custody contract are different. The former should be liable for compensation as long as it is a general fault, while the latter should be liable for compensation only if it is a major fault. Article 374 of the Contract Law stipulates that during the storage period, if the goods are damaged or lost due to improper storage by the custodian, the custodian shall be liable for damages, but the storage is free of charge, and the custodian shall not be liable for damages if he proves that he has no gross negligence.

in this case, it should be considered as a free contract, because according to Article 366 of the Contract Law, the depositor shall pay the safekeeping fee to the custodian as agreed. If the parties have not agreed on the storage fee or the agreement is unclear, and it cannot be determined according to the provisions of Article 61 of this Law, the storage fee is free of charge.

that is to say, the custodian (hotel) must prove that he has no gross negligence before he can be exempted. If he can't prove it, he can't be exempted. The burden of proof is on the administrator.