In ordinary daily life, everyone has written a composition, which is composed of words. After people's ideological consideration, they express a theme through language organization. You always have no way to write a composition? The following is a 600-word composition of a debate I compiled, hoping it will help you.
In the noise of a debate composition 1, some students in our class flushed; Some applaud; Others are angry ... it turns out that our class is having a unique debate about whether it is beneficial to open books. As for me, of course, I choose the "open book is beneficial" side!
Zhang Hao said, "In order to achieve great things, we must read more books. Books are spiritual food. If you don't study all your life, it's the same as not eating. How can this work! " "Yes," Chen Zhihang went on to say, "If people don't study, their motivation will run out and they will feel spiritually deficient." "Books are the ladder of human progress. Without books, people cannot develop and innovate. Doesn't this mean that opening books is beneficial? " I went on to say.
Long Hongyuan, a representative of the opposing side, said: "Books are still medicine. Good books can cure fools, but reading bad books will kill people's minds, which also shows that' opening books may not be beneficial'." He seems to have a plan. Wang Yuchen, another representative of the opposition, said: "Reading bad books is harmful to both body and mind, just like losing your way on the road of life."
Our representative Zhang Junbo quickly retorted: "Books can be said to be beneficial, which requires you to explore and taste. Even if it is a bad book, a truly talented person will find something bad in it and then try to refute it. This is also a sublimation of the soul. " Cui Yutong, an opponent, said: "If a good book fascinates people, isn't it also a missed event?" How can a learned man read those bad books? Those are just your one-sided views. " Say that finish, she pushed the glasses on the bridge of the nose, a pair of stupefied.
Finally, the head teacher made a summary and said, "Whether opening a book is beneficial depends on whether it is a useful volume. It is good to like reading, but don't be too fascinated! "
What an interesting debate!
A debate composition of 600 words 2 This morning, our class held a fierce debate. The positive view holds that opening books is beneficial, while the negative view holds that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. I am the opponent's debater. A "angry words and swords" began.
First of all, the debate between the two sides expounded the views and reasons of all parties, and now it is about to start a debate or even a "quarrel" (haha, it seems to be a quarrel). He said that it is beneficial to open books and gave his own reasons. I'm not easy to mess with. I came prepared. I said angrily, "A good book is better than a treasure house, and a bad book is better than ten robbers." So is it beneficial to open books? What volume do we have to open! We still think it is beneficial to open books. "Three arguments immediately went on to say," I don't think it's right. People say that opening books is beneficial, but you are wrong. Isn't this anti-ancients? "The debate between the three of us turned into a pig liver color, and there was silence for a while. It took a long time to say, "What about the man's mentality?" Sanbian said dismissively in the front, "The murderer holds a knife. Is it bad to blame the knife? "It's time for a free debate. After Lu Chen said some useful reasons for opening this book, our Li Qi should stand up and refute it. I didn't expect her to speak for boys, which really made us dumbfounded. I saw someone talking to himself with his head down and someone laughing. I turned red with anger and thought, Ah! ! Disappointingly, Richie turned her elbow outward. That is, Founder Gan Chengdao said, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools. "Ah! That's a wise statement. Chen Rui quickly argued: "Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: First, it is a good medicine, and medicine can cure diseases; The second is poison, which will kill people, won't it? " Ma Yanze bit back: "You girls say that reading books is not necessarily beneficial, so why do you still study?" Wang Jue retorted, "We girls don't read books, but we don't read useless books! "After some excuses, the teacher announced that the boy won! As for me, I became the best debater!
Although we didn't win the debate, I still think it is very meaningful. Because I understand that the success or failure of the debate is not the key, but should focus on participation.
A debate composition is 600 words 3. Everyone is very happy in the third class this afternoon. Because this class is going to hold a debate contest on "opening books is beneficial"
The game is about to start. We are divided into those for and those against. The students are eager to try. Everyone has prepared a notebook, and it seems that they are looking for flaws in each other all the time. I am a member of the opposition. In other words, support Members who "open books may not be beneficial". I looked at the positions of both sides again, and I couldn't help secretly pleased, haha, it can be said that there are many arguments. And each other is a "nerd"! We are sure to win!
Teacher Xi put forward the requirements of the competition, which mainly means: mutual respect and mutual persuasion. The smell of gunpowder in the classroom is getting stronger and stronger, and the "war of words" is on the verge.
The game has started. First of all, an affirmative debater: Jiang Yumeng, who stood up confidently and seemed to say to us, "We will definitely win!" "The person who impressed me deeply was Qu Zilin, because she said," People who commit crimes because of reading are because their mentality is not right. " This sentence has a big loophole. I must refute her in the future and let the square know our strength.
The most heated debate will be free debate, and everyone will express their opinions. I finally got a chance to talk. I said confidently, "Just now, Qu Zilin said that people who commit crimes because of reading are because of their unhealthy mentality." I want to ask, are all people who commit crimes because of reading bad books because of their unhealthy mentality? Fang Tao Chen Qi stood up with a swish and retorted, "Do you blame this knife for killing people?" And looked at us with a puzzled expression. Before long, our time ran out, but the other party still had 30 seconds, so we had to listen to them. This tastes really bad!
After the debaters of both sides summarized their speeches, Teacher Xi made a summary. She said: "This time, both sides are fully prepared and the debate is inextricably linked. It can be said that the public is right and the woman is right. But in preparation, the other side is still better, so the other side won! "
Through this debate, I learned that it is beneficial to open a book and a useful paper. It's no use opening a book, and it's no use opening a useless piece of paper. This is really a special debate!
The 600-word composition 4 "Open book is beneficial" seems to be an irrefutable truth in the debate, but some people object. In this regard, we launched a special debate contest. The flying heads all pointed to Maimang, and their eyes were wide open and small. No one would give in, but they forced their opponents to the Jedi.
The first round of competition has begun. First of all, Founder 1 began to speak. He clearly said, "I think it is beneficial to open books, because books are the ladder of human progress." After saying his word, the cheerleaders and allies of the square camp began to cheer: Wow, that makes sense. I used a big move for the first time. Some people turned their heads and looked at their allies triumphantly. The eyes clearly said, "Look, look, you will lose." Those anti-party comrades are so angry that their teeth are almost falling out.
But the result seems to be beyond our expectation. Only the debater of the opposing side,No. 1, replied slowly: "Yes, you are right, but there are good and bad books. After reading a bad book, won't the book go bad? " Ancient officialdom was full of scholars, but why were most of them corrupt officials? Haven't you read bad books? ! As soon as this statement came out, the "audience platform" was immediately silent, and everyone looked at the supporters nervously. The opposing allies were so proud that they stuck their tongues out at the pros.
But the diamond player was not flustered at all, and said slowly, "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." This sentence was written by the famous Liu Xiang. How do you explain it? "This hit the nail on the head, even the teacher yu took the lead.
But before he finished, Lao Zhou, the top debater of the opposing side, jumped out.
Asked loudly: "medicine is divided into good medicine and poison." What if I drink poison? " This time, the applause rang louder and the top of the classroom was almost overturned. ...
The debate ended with laughter, and the players and onlookers were still talking about it after class. This is an idiom: enjoy it.
A 600-word debate composition 5 "I object!"
A heated debate is going on.
At first, everyone was very silent, and then slowly entered a good situation. Everyone's chatterboxes were opened, and you debated word by word.
At first, only Le Tong and I had been arguing. He thinks that writing needs too many skills, because we are here to learn writing skills. And I remembered that my composition written in the second grade had no skills at all, and it was well written and praised by the teacher. So I don't think writing requires skill. I waited patiently for him to express his views and immediately refuted him: "I think if you use skills, it will affect your expression of your truest feelings." You know, teachers have always stressed that writing a composition should have true feelings, which is the simplest and requires no skills at all. You see, many of our good articles touch people with emotion, not with skill. "
However, Le Tong retorted loudly: "Writing skills do not hinder the expression of the truest feelings. Sometimes, because of the use of skills, they make the expression of emotions more sincere. Isn't that what we learned from Motherly Love? "
In this way, the two of us were flushed because of this quarrel. Just when the two of us were arguing fiercely, we especially wanted our teammates to help us out. But those teammates who eat melons have been ignoring me, sitting beside me without saying a word, listening with relish, as if listening to our stories, and completely ignoring themselves as debaters. My inner collapse is really not afraid of God-like opponents, but of teammates around me. I'm so stressed.
But this debate is really interesting and exciting. On the one hand, I want to concentrate on listening to the other side's arguments. On the other hand, I have to quickly collect the materials and opinions in my mind and refute them. At first, I thought I won the game, but I didn't expect my opponent to be very powerful and my thinking turned quickly. A lot of times, I still don't speak fluently. Fortunately, my mother let me watch the debate before, and I also mastered some skills, which is still very helpful. It's really like my mother said: Kung Fu is at ordinary times!
A Debate Composition 600 words 6 Today, we had a fierce war of words between the tip of the needle and Maimang. The theme is whether it is beneficial to open books, while the opposing view is that opening books is not necessarily beneficial.
First of all, Zheng Fang stated his point of view: 1, broadening his horizons. 2. Improve your writing ability. 3. Add knowledge. The objection is: 1, bad books hurt people. 2, excessive reading hurts the body. 3, perfunctory reading. 4. Not suitable for this age group.
Then the debate began. Boy, Tang Keren, the main force, talks a lot. Words seem to rush down from the Yellow River, and the happy expression alone is enough to overwhelm a large number of boys. In fact, what she means is: "If you don't study, you will lose your knowledge. If you lose your knowledge, you are a waste. " Oh, we are a shoo-in. We frowned at once, pursed our mouths involuntarily and grabbed our hair. The original witty governance suddenly caught Tang Keren's handle. "If it's a book you can't read, you can't get knowledge from it and waste time." I looked around and had some thoughts in my heart, but I was afraid of pushing the square to the bottom, but it seemed that only I could do it. Finally, courage overcame cowardice and I raised my hand.
"Even if you don't understand it, you can read it over and over again, right?" I expressed my opinion. Sweat flowed out, and every nerve in my body tightened, for fear of saying a wrong word and causing us to be wiped out.
Finally, the really thrilling moment is about to begin-the group debate. A group debate is like a quarrel in which people swear without dirty words. You can only see and hear your own voice with your teammates and opponents. Me and attacking Zheng. I just threw out my opinion: "reading has advantages and disadvantages, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages." He was flatly rejected by Zheng: "That bad book is also beneficial? As you said just now, you can read it over and over again, but some people just don't read it, just like Shen Xinyi, they read it or read it secretly ... ""That's just some people. " "Be, be. And can you stop reading? " "Liu Zhijun, help me!" "Well, this, that ..."
"Forget it," Tao whispered a few words and rejoined the fight, but he was still fighting alone. In the end, Zheng was defeated.
I know any book in this competition, which has advantages and disadvantages. We should buy the right books in the right places.
On Friday afternoon, our school held a special debate! I am lucky to be one of the debaters in our class. Before the competition, the four of us made a lot of preparations: mobilizing the whole class to find information and carefully sorting out the information. Class two sent a "star" lineup. Class two invited the cheerleaders to cheer again. It's really big!
At 2 o'clock in the afternoon, the game begins, and this is the time to really "show your sword"!
Teacher Guo, the host, announced "Six. A pair of sixes. Second, the debate is whether primary school students should watch more TV! The debate begins, please debate and state! " I stood up and said calmly, "Hello, hosts, teachers, classmates and other debaters. Our view is not to show more TV to primary school students, because ... I have finished my exposition. Thank you! " I bowed and sat down. The audience gave thunderous applause. It was the other party's turn to debate the statement, only to see his hands shaking slightly, sitting in his seat, and not even standing to read the statement! I just heard someone say, "How rude!"
One project after another, and finally it's time for free debate. The two sides took out the materials prepared in advance and began to attack each other. "Sorry ..." "Uh-huh ..." Haha! Class two was stopped by us. Taking this opportunity, we used this information to win Class Two again. "Our parents often watch TV, but there is nothing to do. What do you explain? " At this moment, my eyes lit up and I replied, "The topic of our debate is whether primary school students should watch TV, not parents. Please pay attention to the other side! " "Good, good!" Applause rang out from the audience, and Class Two was once again speechless by us! How time flies! Teacher Guo announced the end of the game! But everyone is excited!
"Well, if there is still time, we must kill him!"
Debate not only exercises our eloquence, but also improves our ability to judge right and wrong. I really hope that the school will organize more such activities.
A Debate Composition of 600 words 8 I am very excited when I think of the debate I participated in the other day, because it was my first time to participate in such a competition.
Our debate topic is "the influence of technology on life", and our debate topic is "technology makes life better". Before the competition, several classmates and I did a lot of preparatory work and collected a lot of information, so I was full of confidence. On the day of the debate, my legs went weak as soon as I sat in the chair. At the beginning of the debate, my mind went blank and I didn't know what to do. I said to myself in my heart, "Don't be afraid. If you listen carefully to the debate, you will certainly sum up the language. "
When I listened, I found that the other party had many breakthroughs, and then I checked our information and found that I could ask the other party with our information. At this time, my brain is like a fire-burning machine, and these materials are the materials for burning fire. It is precisely because of these materials that the fire burns vigorously and the other party cannot break it.
Finally, it's my turn to debate. I stood up, made a gesture for the other person to answer, and then said, "Can you forgive the other person for not using gel pen, ballpoint pen and pen for a week in the second debate?" Can you stop watching TV, listening to the news, reading newspapers, reading books and surfing the Internet for a week? Can you not eat rice or pasta for a week? You know, technology is inseparable from our lives! "I launched the first attack on the other side." Excuse me, "I launched the second attack and didn't give in." Have you ever choked on your food and stopped eating? "I saw the other party looking for a lot of information in front, clutching his head and unable to answer. His teammates clenched their fists and stamped their feet anxiously. ...
After this incident, I think there will be such a "life battle" in my future life. At this time, we must make full preparations. In the face of fear, you must calm down and tell yourself that I can do it!
;