Hou Wang took the noodle restaurant to court and claimed the related economic loss of 5490.6 yuan.

Recently, the court pronounced a verdict on the case, and found that the noodle restaurant was responsible for 30% and compensated Wang for various economic losses 1 105.74 yuan.

Wang's heart disease hospitalization was caused by shock, and the dog owner should bear tort liability; As the manager of the hotel, the noodle restaurant has failed to fulfill its security obligations within reasonable limits, and there are certain faults, so it should bear corresponding supplementary responsibilities. At present, neither side can find a dog owner. Without knowing the direct perpetrator, Wang Can only asked the noodle restaurant to bear supplementary responsibilities commensurate with its fault. Combined with the actual situation of this case, the court ruled that the noodle restaurant should bear 30% liability for Wang's economic losses.

Just because the dog jumped out of the store and was scared of a heart attack, the hotel was also responsible. This development is indeed a bit unusual.

However, the court will consider various factors before making such a treatment.