I have to say that there are still some wonders in this practice. In fact, many people thought this rule was a bit unreasonable at first, and it should be aimed at not only the brand, but also the customers who especially like to drink this drink shop. Should they choose between the two stores?
According to the response of the shopping mall, the two stores have contradictions with each other and even fought. Although the mall has been negotiating, the relationship between the two stores has not been reconciled and coordinated so far. However, in any case, this method is definitely unprotected, which is a very unreasonable regulation, at least unfair to consumers.
Cinemas are forbidden to bring things, just like hot pot restaurants are forbidden to bring drinks, but generally speaking, cinemas will prohibit people from bringing some food because it is too strong for fear of affecting other audiences. Specially for this kind of food is very rare.
I feel that this is actually like two children quarreling and having a conflict. The cinema directly wrote that it did not accept the food in the beverage store and called on everyone to buy it carefully, which was a bit naive and childish, but in fact, it could not be said that this beverage had an odor. This is entirely because the neighbors are not very good, so there will be such conflicts.
However, the supervision of cinemas actually violates consumers' right to choose independently to a certain extent, because consumers should choose voluntarily and equally. If this matter is due to contradictions, it is another matter, but if it is for profit and excludes other brands, it is unfair competition.