On February 27th, a takeaway brother in Guangzhou vomited on the Internet, and someone placed a one-time order for thousands of yuan in a tea shop. However, the delivery fee paid by the Meituan for so many milk teas was only 5 yuan.

In response, Meituan's customer service said that the delivery fee is calculated according to the distance, and the younger brother should be able to apply for the weight subsidy afterwards, because Meituan has a large single subsidy, and the settlement logic is that if the actual amount paid by the user minus the delivery fee paid by the user is not lower than that of 81 yuan, there will be a reward, which will be automatically calculated by the system.

Extended information:

Extended reading-Meituan and Hungry "War"

Meituan and Hungry have always been the two giants of the take-away catering platform, and the competition between them is very fierce. In order to gain market, the platform often has "two choices".

Recently, the Intermediate People's Court of Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province made a judgment on the previous practice of Zhejiang Jinhua Meituan Group asking some merchants to reach exclusive transactions with it. The court gave full support to the hungry petition asking the US Mission to compensate for the economic loss of 1 million yuan.

This incident can be traced back to 2116 -2117 at the earliest. It is reported that Meituan Jinhua Branch used the way of signing an agreement and a "cooperation commitment letter" in its operation, stipulating that if the merchants only engage in exclusive business with it, they will enjoy a preferential service fee price, which will be 2% after the discount. If the merchants violate the agreement and cooperate with other "service platforms operating the same or similar business", the service fee standard will be raised to 6%. This behavior has the situation of using improper means to hinder others from trading with competitors.

this time, meituan was sentenced to monopoly and paid 1 million yuan for being hungry, which is a good thing for consumers. After all, only when enterprises compete with each other, consumers can get the greatest benefits and the industry can get better development.