This behavior of the restaurant is legal in the editor's view. Because this consumer is not an ordinary consumer, he is a food blogger and may be suspected of "hype".

according to the provisions of the law on the protection of consumers' rights and interests, business operators should follow the principles of voluntariness, equality, fairness, honesty and credibility when dealing with consumers. In principle, merchants cannot refuse customers' consumption, but they have the right to refuse individual consumers' consumption for the sake of the safety of most customers.

At the same time, according to the provisions of China's Consumer Protection Law, consumers have the right to choose their own operators to provide goods or services, choose their own products or service methods, and decide whether to buy or not to buy any kind of goods, accept or not to accept any kind of services, which is the right given to consumers by law. However, the law does not clearly stipulate that restaurant operators are not allowed to refuse to provide services to consumers.

next, let's take another look at this matter. According to relevant media reports, a food blogger named Mr. Kang in Changsha, Hunan Province was "banned" by a seafood barbecue cafeteria named Han Dadi because he "ate too much".

The owner of the cafeteria angrily accused Mr. Kang, a food blogger. The owner said, "He only eats good food when he comes here, expensive food, seafood in pots, kebabs in handfuls, soy milk and drinks. He can drink forty or fifty boxes! I just do small business, and I can't lose money like this every day. "

Mr. Kang argued that "although he ate a lot, he didn't violate the restaurant's consumption rules, nor did he cause any food waste. The restaurant" blocked "himself, which made him very sad".

netizens have different views on this. Some netizens think that this boss is "bullying the weak and fearing the hard", and he is allowed to enter the store when he has a small appetite, and shirks it for various reasons when he has a large appetite, doing business with a steady profit. However, some netizens think that although this restaurant is a self-service barbecue restaurant, the food blogger's practice is too much, and he can eat in another restaurant, especially when the overall market of the catering industry is not good this year. This is the rhythm of eating it.

In this case, in fact, the owners of barbecue restaurants who are passionate about France have the right to refuse to receive Mr. Kang. Legally, the editor has already analyzed it in the previous article, so I won't repeat it. Emotionally, I think Mr. Kang's practice is really a bit excessive. It is certainly acceptable if he only eats once or twice occasionally. However, if you go to eat regularly, it is a bit of a deliberate speculation. After all, the other party opens a shop to make money by doing business. You're obviously smashing a signboard by doing this, which is hard for anyone to accept.