forcing merchants to choose one of the two, they can only choose their own platforms, which is monopolistic behavior. After Ali, the anti-monopoly knife was opened to Meituan. In fact, earlier cases of choosing one of the two platforms of Meituan have occurred repeatedly, and there have been cases of punishment for Meituan in various places, but Meituan has never corrected the relevant practices. Some merchants said that the current US group will not say it clearly? Choose between two? Through other means, such as strategic cooperation or other cooperation agreements, the purpose is to let merchants choose Meituan as a platform. Once merchants choose other take-away platforms, Meituan will cancel the traffic of merchants' stores on the platform, or even directly remove them.

Not only is it a choice, Meituan has continuously increased the commission of merchants through its leading market position. Earlier, a restaurant association in a certain place criticized that Meituan's percentage of merchants was too high, which seriously hurt the interests of merchants. But for Meituan, it doesn't care about these, because it has occupied more market share. If the merchants don't choose Meituan platform, it may cause great losses.

It is precisely because of this that Meituan takes a fancy to this point. By taking advantage of its own scale, it constantly deducts and squeezes merchants, not only monopolizing their online trading share, but also raising commissions and increasing their profits. It is also very reasonable for the supervision unit to investigate it this time, and I hope it can also be severely punished.

Reference:

The General Administration of Market Supervision issued an announcement on 26th: Recently, according to the report, the General Administration of Market Supervision implemented the law against the US delegation? Choose between two? Such as suspected monopolistic behavior. In this regard, the US Mission said: The US Mission received a notice from the State Administration of Markets and filed an investigation into the alleged monopolistic behavior of the US Mission according to law. The company will actively cooperate with the investigation of the regulatory authorities, further improve the level of business compliance management, protect the legitimate rights and interests of users and all parties, promote the long-term healthy development of the industry, and earnestly fulfill its social responsibilities. At present, the company's various businesses are operating normally. ?

Zhao Zhanling, a lawyer of Beijing Yunjia Law Firm, said in an interview that anti-monopoly is one of the eight economic tasks determined by the Central Economic Work Conference this year. After Alibaba was severely punished, three ministries and commissions, including the General Administration of Market Supervision, asked 34 Internet companies to check and correct themselves within one month and make rectification.