In Xiamen, there is a net red restaurant featuring Jay Chou, with posters of Jay Chou hanging all over the store and dishes named after Jay Chou's songs.

Causing many fans to assume that this is the restaurant opened by Jay Chou, and have gone to dine and hit the spot. But this year, Jay took the restaurant to court in order to protect his portrait rights, claiming that the restaurant did not have his legal authorization.

The plaintiff Jay claimed that the restaurant had committed the following violations without his legal authorization:

One, the use of the plaintiff's portrait on the restaurant's electronic screens and wall TVs

Two, the use of the plaintiff's portrait on the restaurant's menu cover and title page

Three, the use of a large number of the plaintiff's portrait in the restaurant's decorative design, the use of the plaintiff's portrait in the hair-lit polka dots portrait wall

Four, in the public Dianping, word of mouth and other public **** platform that the restaurant for the plaintiff, misleading consumers

Five, in front of the restaurant to use the plaintiff's personal standing signs, etc.

Jay Chou sued the restaurant for damages according to the law.

But on August 19, the restaurant, called ?J Warrior? restaurant, responded to the matter through its own official microblog.

The official microblog told the story of the restaurant's creation, and also explained that the restaurant had obtained authorization through franchising.

When J Daredevil opened its Xiamen store, Jay Chou and his partner Fong congratulated the restaurant. The picture above shows the official microblogging show the relevant authorization responsibility.

J Daredevil? Restaurant said that as a franchise, after learning that the authorization was suddenly suspended, they contacted Beijing Magic Sky Lun at the first time, and carried out a series of rectifications in line with the requirements put forward by Jay Chou, and received affirmation. But in December 2019, they learned that the restaurant had been sued, and the material evidence of the lawsuit was exactly the video and picture information before they cooperated with the rectification.

The official microblogging site posted screenshots of the relevant contracts and emails to prove their innocence, and emphasized that they had absolutely not deceived consumers.

Now, the Xiamen Haicang court has officially opened the case, which is still being followed up.