As can be seen from the figure, restaurants in online celebrity have a large proportion in the city center. Compared with ordinary restaurants, the spatial distribution is more concentrated and closer to the city center. According to the actual life, the level of land rent in the city center is higher, which shows that restaurants in online celebrity have higher ability to pay land rent, so A is wrong; Online celebrity restaurants rely on the network to gain popularity, and the dependence on the network is far greater than that of ordinary restaurants, but it does not mean that the network conditions of online celebrity restaurants are better, and they only rely on the network platform to achieve the role of gaining popularity, so B is wrong; According to the materials and illustrations, we can't judge the number of restaurants. We can only know that the proportion of restaurants and ordinary restaurants in online celebrity changes with the distance from the city center, but we can't judge their distribution density, so C is wrong; Online celebrity restaurants rely on the Internet to expand their business scope, such as McDonald's, and constantly use the Internet to expand their business scope in various cities and counties. By analogy, we can see that online celebrity restaurants have a wide range of radiation, so D is not obvious for p>PS: possible D option, but the exclusion method can be used. The first three options are obviously wrong, and D option is relatively correct, or if you look at the picture again, you will find that there are still some in the range of 15-21, but after 21, online celebrity restaurants disappear and ordinary restaurants. Adopt