that's a good question.

I tell you clearly that "refusing to bring your own drinks" belongs to the overlord clause. You can complain at 315.

It is against the new law to prohibit bringing your own drinks. According to Article 26 of the new Consumer Law, operators are not allowed to make unfair and unreasonable provisions to consumers, such as excluding or restricting consumers' rights, reducing or exempting operators' responsibilities, and aggravating consumers' responsibilities, by means of format clauses, notices, explanations, shop notices, etc., and are not allowed to use format clauses and technical means to force transactions.

But at present, many shops are ignorant of the law, and they still think they are very right. They should pay attention to their own safety when reasoning with him and telling the truth. The Supreme Law makes it clear that "no bringing your own drinks" belongs to the overlord clause of the catering industry. On February 2, 2114, the people's court made it clear that "no bringing your own drinks" and "minimum consumption in private rooms" belong to the overlord clause formulated by the catering industry that violates the Contract Law and the Consumer Protection Law.

the Supreme People's Court said that if consumers encounter disputes arising from the overlord clause when catering operators provide services, the provisions of the Consumer Law can be applied, but not the Regulations. The Supreme People's Court further pointed out that "no bringing your own drinks" and "minimum consumption in private rooms" are unfair and unreasonable provisions made by catering operators by taking advantage of their dominant position, which are in violation of relevant laws and regulations and belong to the overlord clause. Consumers may request the people's court to confirm that the overlord clause is invalid.

Good luck, hope to adopt it, thank you!