Japanese drama problem restaurant, Japanese soujun can already watch it!

I heard that it was a Japanese drama about women's rights, and it was specially made up. Although it was a few years late, I couldn't help but want to make a long speech and write my feelings.

On the whole, the story is good. You can see the desire to speak for women in the workplace, and the plot is smooth and attractive, which makes people want to read it in one breath. However, some key settings are very unsuccessful, and the most speechless is a forced start and a forced end.

Let's talk about the May incident that became the motivation of the hostess to open the store.

Does this plot make many viewers feel silly? Let you take it off, even there are many criticisms such as av plots and gimmicks. Can't the public notice the director's high conception?

Personally, I really can't blame the low level of public appreciation. This plot is really retarded.

First of all, judging from the nature of the incident, did Yumu really undress May for the purpose of sexual harassment?

It is true that from the usual performance, this company is full of male chauvinism, and executives who like to touch the bottoms of female employees are everywhere. It seems that letting female employees take off their clothes is like this series of sexual harassment has finally reached its peak-

However, here is a small detail.

I went to the head office to apologize in May. At that time, there were 16 people present, that is to say, the senior leaders of the whole head office were here. Did they come to watch undress in May?

No way, they are not so idle. Besides, judging by common sense, May probably ran away crying, and the people present didn't expect that she would really take off, so Yumu made this request at that time, and when she hesitated, she stood up and prepared to leave.

So, why are so many senior leaders of the whole company gathered in the conference room to watch the apology in May? The reason is simple, because this matter itself is so serious. Although May is delegated to a branch, she belongs to the head office, so she has to carry the whole pot to keep the branch. Its essence is to ask the head office to which she belongs to carry the whole pot-after all, in the eyes of the general public, May has no name. Even if it is a mistake made in May, the public will only remember that the catering group to which she belongs made a mistake. Assuming that May poisoned the guests, the public remembers that xx Group poisoned the guests.

every employee is the representative of the company, and what you do is the representative of the company in the eyes of customers. Japanese people like to tell new people repeatedly because it is true.

then, from another angle, it is that there was a food poisoning incident in the branch. In May, as an employee of the head office, I came to meet the president of the head office and asked the head office to carry the whole pot-it is not difficult to understand that 16 senior executives gathered in the conference room. After all, it is self-evident that food poisoning is a great blow to a catering group. Look at Xueyin Group.

So Yumu asked to undress in May. Personally, he thought that the purpose was not sexual harassment, but embarrassment. He hoped to retreat in May, instead of asking to carry the whole pot-because it would lead to the head office having to carry the whole pot with him. If you were a male employee, the means might be that you crawled under my crotch. You see, this is not a sexist incident against women.