In order to make people save food and not waste food, many restaurants have formulated some measures, hoping to make consumers not order too much in the process of ordering. A restaurant in Changsha has implemented a system that consumers should weigh themselves before ordering, and then order. Some netizens asked if this move was to refuse to waste? The original intention of the visit is to let consumers not waste when ordering food, but in fact the effect has indeed been resisted by consumers.

Nowadays, many people get food unconsciously. A large part of the reason lies in ordering food while eating. When ordering food, consumers are hungry, so they often overestimate their food intake. In this case, it is easy for consumers to order more dishes, which leads to endless consumption and finally waste. This behavior is very bad, because although we have food and drink now, we don't worry about not having food. However, in many parts of the country, many people are starving, and they are scrambling to eat a mouthful of rice. It is really wrong for us to waste food here.

Therefore, many restaurants want consumers to order less food during the ordering process so as not to waste it. However, the practice of Changsha restaurant is not liked by consumers, because this restaurant lets consumers weigh themselves before eating. It can be said that weight is their privacy for many people and they are unwilling to announce it to the public. Visiting this practice is exposing consumers' privacy. In fact, it is very wrong.

furthermore, if consumers want to order less vegetables, they should not be weighed, but should be asked to order less vegetables, and if they are not enough, they should add vegetables to eat. Only in this way can we truly achieve no waste. It can be said that the intention of this visit is good, but the measures taken are wrong, which has led everyone to condemn this practice. Therefore, when visiting some systems, we must consider whether this practice can achieve the final effect, or is it counterproductive?