Before discussing the matter of whether or not takeaway operations are really reliable, I think we can discuss whether or not restaurant branding, restaurant space design, and restaurant training are reliable. When I see this topic I guess most of them will say that these are quite reliable, why is it reliable? Because the delivery of these things and the delivery of takeaway operations have most of the business mind is not the same standard, design class delivery is the picture or drawing, training class delivery is the process and experience, takeaway operations delivery is "money (turnover)".
The design class and training class in the delivery process, control the dominant influence is actually in the hands of the B side. Originally, when we analyzed the nature of the takeaway, we mentioned that "the essence of the takeaway is to provide users with products to meet their needs and earn a reasonable profit", and the dominant influencing factor in this logic is actually back in the hands of Party A. If these basic conditions are not met, then we should be able to make a decision. If the party in the case of these basic conditions are relatively good, on behalf of the operation to do is through its skills to ignite the fuse can be, if these basic factors have not done a good job, and then bullish operation are powerless to return to heaven.
Is not really reliable is a relative concept, first of all, we should be the theory of purpose, looking for the purpose of the operation? Merchants generally have the following kinds of demand: First, the growth of single volume (do data show points, and then you know); Second, do the growth of the gross profit amount (this is currently more encouraged, in the case of relatively no increase in fixed costs, to get more gross profit amount); Third, do the outsourcing of manpower (their own recruiting operation involves recruiting, training, management, labor and other explicit and silent costs, sometimes not as cost-effective as outsourcing). These categories in the first and second category to do the most vigorous demand for growth, here is also the most likely to be unreliable thing, unreliable in fact, is the cost of Party A paid much higher than the value created by Party B for it. So this has a lot to do with Party B's charging mode, operation level and Party A's basic conditions. Of course, do not deny that the industry is full of a lot of "fried chicken (industry black words, meaning that the crown of a small set of a)" service providers, such as charging a few thousand per month, the commitment to how long after how many orders to you, if not to achieve the follow-up service will not be charged.
Generally speaking there are currently three models most popular: pure commission, pure collection service fees, basic service fees + commission. The service provider to provide pure commission mode is less, generally speaking, the service chain type of large merchants will be used in this type of mode, the model for the merchants is the least risky one, because it is purely according to the effect of the payment, for the operation of the company to make the effect is more important than the new signing. Pure service fee (relatively high price), the model for the merchant is the most risky one, because no matter how the effect is charged the same fee, for the operating company to renew and new signing the same effect. Basic service fee (relatively low price) + commission, the model for the merchant and the operating company is relatively good way to weigh their interests, because the final effect is the merchant and the operating company **** with the superimposed results. The basic service fee paid by the merchant is used to ensure that the operation team completes the normal service process, regardless of whether the results are good or bad to pay for the basic costs, while more revenue comes from the actual results.
The professional services of DZFH have already covered more cities in China, taking Wuhan as the center to promote the national business, and quickly set up local service teams in nearly 20 cities such as Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Fuzhou, Wuhan, Tianjin, etc., and cooperated with the local food and beverage brands. The professional services have not only attracted the continued presence of first-tier brands such as Starbucks, Unilever, Texaco, Chow Hei Duck, and Mangi Desserts, but even created a 6 to 10 times growth in takeout for some of the catering companies.
Through the powerful technology and professional services of DVN, the majority of traditional catering and retail enterprises as well as many small and medium-sized merchants are liberated from the online business, and are able to focus more on the research and development and polishing of their products, and hand in hand with the *** advancement of the company, we look forward to DVN's further assistance to help China's catering and new retail business to take off.