First, shorten the isolation period and revitalize the tourism industry.
Because COVID-19 is highly contagious, the global tourism industry has been greatly affected since the outbreak of the epidemic. Take China as an example. Compared with the same period of last year, the proportion of outbound travel in China has dropped by nearly 80%, and the tourism industry has been hit, which not only affects the income of tourist attractions, but also affects related industries such as accommodation and aviation. The unknown epidemic situation in foreign countries and the need for 14 days quarantine for entry and exit have all become reasons to prevent people from going out.
Second, it has stimulated related industries to some extent.
In order to revive its tourism and related industries, Britain has made a decision to shorten the quarantine period for entry personnel, which will stimulate the tourism and aviation industries to some extent. However, the length of the isolation period is not the decisive factor for everyone to choose whether to leave the country. Under the premise that the global epidemic situation is not stable, it is impossible to fundamentally solve the problem of tourism decline by shortening the isolation period.
Third, the epidemic control is unfriendly.
Because of COVID-19's cunning, the entry-exit quarantine period is about 14 days, and the British government itself has shortened the quarantine period to stimulate tourism, which is likely to give COVID-19 an opportunity. This is actually not a good way for the British epidemic control itself.
For more topics about the British government's shortening of the immigration quarantine period, please leave a comment in the message area.
Why are some upscale hotels and guesthouses almost uninvited, but have been able to stand?