Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering training - Is there any economic compensation for the non-renewal of the catering rental cooperation contract when it expires?
Is there any economic compensation for the non-renewal of the catering rental cooperation contract when it expires?
It should be judged according to the specific contents of the contract. Under the same conditions, the lessee has the priority to lease, but if the lessor reasonably repossesses the house and does not renew the contract when the normal contract expires, it does not violate the relevant contents of the contract. Generally speaking, it does not violate the contract, so there is no economic compensation.

The priority of extension lease refers to the priority under the same conditions. If we can't reach an agreement on the price, we will no longer enjoy the priority of renting. Therefore, it is difficult for renters to match the latest rental price if they want to get the priority to rent. Moreover, according to the liability for breach of contract and the right of rescission under the exclusive clause, generally speaking, if the lease contract does not clearly stipulate the liability for breach of contract, the court usually only supports the lessee's business losses caused by horizontal competition, but in practice, it is difficult to prove the business losses and causality, and the court usually does not support it or makes a judgment as appropriate; If the exclusive clause of the lease contract does not stipulate that the lessee has the right to terminate the contract, the lessee usually cannot claim to terminate the lease contract on the grounds that the purpose of the contract cannot be achieved.

The legal basis is Article 369 of the Civil Code: the right of residence shall not be transferred or inherited. Houses with the right of residence shall not be rented, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Article 7 16 of the Civil Code: The lessee may sublease the leased property to a third party with the consent of the lessor. If the lessee sublets, the lease contract between the lessee and the lessor shall remain valid; If a third party causes losses to the lease item, the lessee shall compensate for the losses. If the lessee sublets without the consent of the lessor, the lessor may terminate the contract. Article 718 of the Civil Code: If the lessor knows or should know that the lessee subleases, and fails to raise any objection within six months, it shall be deemed that the lessor has agreed to sublease. Article 734 of the Civil Law: If the lessee continues to use the leased property at the expiration of the lease term and the lessor does not raise any objection, the original lease contract will remain valid, but the lease term is uncertain. At the expiration of the lease term, under the same conditions, the lessee has the priority to lease. Article 21 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Disputes over Urban Housing Lease Contracts stipulates that if the lessor sells the leased house within a reasonable period without notifying the lessee or there are other cases that infringe the lessee's preemptive right, the people's court shall support it. However, the people's court will not support the request to confirm that the house sales contract signed by the lessor and the third party is invalid.