On February 1 day, the State Administration of Market Supervision issued the Guiding Opinions on Investigating and Punishing the Illegal Acts of Driving Up Prices in the Prevention and Control of novel coronavirus Epidemic, but it did not stipulate the purchase and sale price difference, only stipulated that "the operator sold the same kind of goods, which exceeded the purchase and sale price difference of the last actual transaction before June 65438+1October 19" or "before the epidemic occurred" Or 65438+1October 19, the actual transaction situation can't be verified, and the operator significantly increases the price on the basis of the purchase cost and fails to correct it immediately after being warned by the market supervision department ",which can be considered as price fraud.

Four, the operator has one of the following circumstances, can be identified as constituting the "provisions on administrative penalties for price violations," the provisions of article sixth (two) of the price violations.

(1) Operators who produce epidemic prevention supplies and raw materials for epidemic prevention supplies fail to put their products on the market in time and continue to hoard them after being warned by the market supervision department;

(two) wholesale operators, not timely epidemic prevention supplies, supplies for the people's livelihood to the consumer terminal, and continue to hoard after being warned by the market supervision department;

(3) The retail chain operators fail to sell relevant commodities to the outside world in time, except for keeping the inventory necessary for maintaining business continuity, and continue to hoard after being warned by the market supervision department.