Now the construction of rural school buildings is getting better and better, and they are basically equipped with modern teaching equipment. The hardware gap seems to be getting smaller and smaller, but the software gap is very large.

1, the gap in family education.

Family environment can have an important influence on the formation of students' outlook on life, values and world outlook, and then affect children's psychology and character. At the same time, it also has a decisive influence on children's learning attitudes and habits.

Whether it is the material conditions of the family or the cultural quality and level of parents, there is still a big gap between rural children and urban children. Therefore, the learning attitude and habits of rural children in this family environment are far from those of urban children.

2. School management gap.

School management is an important part of school education, and it is a behavior activity to ensure the reasonable and efficient school education activities. The management quality and working ability of principals directly affect the educational activities and teaching quality of schools.

Generally speaking, there is still a gap between the principals of rural schools and those of urban schools in knowledge, experience, vision and ideological consciousness.

Therefore, from this point alone, there is still a certain gap between school management in rural areas and cities.

3. The gap of teachers' level.

Although there are many excellent teachers in rural areas at present, most of them are to take care of their families, or there is no opportunity for upward mobility, because mobility is generally limited by age.

Relatively speaking, rural education can't retain talents, and excellent teachers will always flow upward whenever they have the opportunity: small villages-central schools-counties-cities-provincial capitals.

The gap can also be seen from the recruitment conditions: rural schools need to train junior high school students in a targeted manner, and in order to avoid brain drain, they need to sign service contracts;

In some cities, non-undergraduate starting points have no chance to participate in teacher recruitment.

4. Students' quality gap.

The bad learning attitudes and habits developed by rural children at home can't stop at home, and they will be brought to school by children, and children will interact with each other and gradually form a bad class learning atmosphere. This bad learning atmosphere is not only very bad for children's study, but also very bad for their physical and mental development.

On the contrary, because most children in cities have better family conditions and their parents have higher cultural quality and level, they have developed better learning attitudes and habits. Similarly, this kind of good learning attitude and habit brought to school has also formed a better class learning atmosphere.

Personally, I think it is still relatively large. My primary school was in the countryside for the first three years, and then I transferred to the town. Generally speaking, my knowledge is less than that of the students in the county. Then I went to school in the county. Although I was in a key school in high school, after I went to college, I still feel that the gap between students in rural areas or small counties and students in cities is still relatively large. In the past two years in college, I have met many people, and I can feel that children who go to school in cities have a wide range of knowledge.

I'm glad to answer your question.

There is a big gap between education in cities and education in villages and towns.

In the city, if it is not a key school or a private school, the teaching level of ordinary public schools is very poor, and many teachers just mix salaries, but if it is a private school, it is different. As the saying goes, a penny is worth a penny, and the tuition is more, so teachers are naturally responsible, and the school's hardware facilities are different.

My suggestion is that if you can't choose an aristocratic school in the city, you'd better go back to a rural school.

Why should rural schools teach better? There are mainly these reasons:

First, teachers in rural schools are absolutely responsible.

Because in the countryside, everyone belongs to the villagers and knows each other. We can't look up at each other when we are in a hurry. Because of this factor, the teacher is responsible. Teachers in rural areas are generally locals. In order to establish their prestige and reputation, these teachers often try their best to educate their children in a responsible attitude towards the local people in their hometown, and teachers will also care about their children's problems, such as physical discomfort. Teachers in the city can't do this at all. Teachers in public schools in the city are basically mixed salaries, because in their view, no matter how well they do, their wages are just a little bit, so they muddle along day by day. Moreover, in order to increase their income, these teachers deliberately don't attend classes well, and then when students can't keep up with their grades, they open small classes to collect tips from students, which is euphemistically called cram schools. Why are the students in the city getting poor grades in recent years? So I said, if you want your children to get good grades in the city, you must have a good family education or go to an aristocratic school.

Second, there are few students in rural schools, so it is easier for teachers to teach students well.

With the continuous advancement of urbanization, there are fewer and fewer students in many rural schools. There are only 70 or 80 students in a school in our hometown, and only 18 students in a class. But there are at least 50 students in a class in the city, and some classes have more than 80 students. This kind of classroom teacher is simply suffering. In order to attend class, first put on headphones to plug his ears, because it is too noisy, and then the whole tweeter lectures gently, for fear that students will hear, it doesn't matter if you are noisy. After a semester, most students got 50 or 60 points in the final exam. Go back to your hometown during the Spring Festival and ask the children in the countryside. They said that all the students in their class got a perfect score of 100 in math, except one child with a Chinese score of 98, and the rest got perfect scores. I thought it over. There are seventeen or eighteen students in a class, and the teacher is equivalent to teaching you by hand. Is it strange to get poor grades?

Third, the smart life in the city is not conducive to children's learning.

Now the children in the city come home, just playing mobile phones, playing games or watching TV, just like a pervert. Some mothers play mobile phones all day. The first thing they do when they open their eyes in the morning is to look at their mobile phones, and then they hardly leave their hands. They watch their mobile phones when they eat, when they go to the toilet, when they cook, and when they fall into the pot, so they often change them. Now the social environment is like this. TV movies make those small meats earn a lot of money, and mobile games also play the richest man. This is the real environment, so there is a big problem in children's education now. In the past, education focused on moral, intellectual, physical and artistic work. Now education is all about theory and games. There is no need to advocate moral, intellectual, physical and artistic work.

Fourth, children in rural areas are safer and healthier.

Nowadays, children in cities often have colds and fever, but children in rural areas are different. Some of them still need to walk for more than ten minutes to get to school. There are many uncontrolled mountains next to the school, so that children can get full exercise. In recent years, the construction of rural schools has been very good, and students have lost a lot. Every student in a school can share more teaching equipment. Our old school directly gives each student two or three pairs of table tennis bats, two or three basketballs and football. The point is that these are all free. The school has a wide range of activities, so you can play whatever you want. But schools in cities are different. In the city, there are almost no exercise equipment and places except for a large number of people and classrooms. Many schools don't even have a football field, only a symbolic basketball court, and badminton, tennis and table tennis venues are not needed. A slightly larger school also has a football field, but each student costs four or five hundred yuan per semester. It turns out that the school regards this football field as a profit tool.

Summary: Due to the environmental pollution in the city, people's life is under great pressure, teachers pursue commercial interests, and distrust between people leads to the luxury of cultivating students in the city. In rural areas, education is purely a broken undertaking, without any commercial interests, and education is purely for education. So my opinion is that rural education is better and stronger than urban education.

There are still differences, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages. You can only get it if you give up. In towns and villages, it is convenient to go home every day. If I go to the city, I can only live on campus without staying at home, but these are external conditions. The most important internal condition is that you have to look at the child's wishes. There are also towns and villages that are admitted to key universities every year, and many people in the city can't even get into an ordinary undergraduate course. Although it is now said that it is difficult for poor families to have expensive children, I think the key reason depends on children's willingness to learn. I am the most ordinary farmer. I didn't take good care of my children's studies since I was a child. At that time, my daughter was unable to send them to the city because of poor economic conditions at home. She goes to junior high school in the town. Although admitted to high school, the score is not high, but her daughter's temper is indomitable. After entering high school, she was suddenly enlightened and her grades improved by leaps and bounds. Finally, she got a doctorate. Her son is young and his family conditions are getting better. Although she has been in the city since elementary school, and her college entrance examination scores are not as high as her sister's, I still have to ask more opinions from my children, where to go, come on, and train Master Shuo and Phillips well. Both children are very sensible and will certainly do a lot in the future.

There is a big difference between going to school in the city and going to school in the countryside! Children in the city still have great advantages in educational resources, such as better teachers, more professional teaching methods, good educational facilities and strong ability to contact with society.

Now the educational resources in cities are better than those in rural areas. Although rural areas are basically teaching buildings, the only change is the hardware. Personally, I feel that teachers in cities are better and the educational concept is more advanced than that in rural areas. In the city, the relationship between home and school is relatively close, and there are more interest classes in cram schools, which can better explore children's potential and improve their ability. Sometimes experience is a kind of wealth! In addition, children need accommodation to go to school in the city like you, so they can exercise their ability to live independently earlier, which is helpful for personal growth and shaping better social cognitive ability! In addition, there are many students in the city, and there are many excellent children and students with special skills, which can set an example for children and stimulate their self-motivation. The power of example is sometimes endless! In addition, considering that there are many children in the city, it will be of great benefit to future social relations. After all, China is a relational society!

Let's talk about the benefits of going to school in the countryside first. The relative pressure of going to school in rural areas is small, both the economic pressure of adults and the learning pressure of children are small. Parents don't have to pick up and drop off regularly, and children can ride home. Children can have a happy childhood with little study pressure! In addition, when children go to school in rural areas or towns, they always have an inexplicable yearning for urban life, which can be the motivation for children to learn! Children in rural areas are relatively simple, children in cities are more competitive, school uniforms are the same, and shoes are the most expensive Nike Adipuma is standard. Adon should also pay attention to this. Poor food and clothing can easily cause psychological burden to children and make them feel inferior. Of course, we don't ask children to go to school more vain than food and clothing! But we must also pay attention to this! The other is that children suddenly enter a new environment. Can he adapt? Observe children's psychological changes in the early stage, correct and guide them in time if there are mistakes, and avoid children taking detours! In addition, when children reach puberty and rebellious period in junior high school, their temper is unstable, and the phenomenon of puppy love may also appear. Children in boarding schools should communicate with teachers in time and accurately and guide them correctly! This is not an alarmist, you will know by the second day of junior high school!

In short, going to school has advantages and disadvantages. Children need parents to help them weigh, but listen to their opinions on the basis of soliciting their opinions! I am not a teacher or a professional in the field of education. I'm just a parent of a student who just took the senior high school entrance examination. I use my experience to tell you some experiences, just to make you avoid detours! I hope Phillips can successfully enter an ideal high school in his junior high school life in the next three years. Come on!

Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Studying in towns and villages is close to home, so don't worry about life. Children are in adolescence, so parents should observe and care more, which is conducive to communication and solve problems immediately when they find them. On the contrary, if you go to the city to study, the teachers, teaching environment and learning atmosphere may be better, but the temptation outside is also great. Children can't tell right from wrong and will follow others. My point is to see what kind of personality your child is. If you have good self-control, initiative and good study habits, there is no need to go far away. If the child is naughty and wants to go outside to restrain himself, he can try to go outside. Children don't have much time with them, so cherish it!

Definitely different! Height difference has nothing to do with knowledge!

It's big. If you go to school from the countryside to the city, students may have different values, and you will feel inferior.

Personally, students from rural areas are more realistic, and children who go to school in cities are more psychologically competitive. The last sentence is that gold always shines.

I think it's quite big. Cities have more contact with things than towns and villages, and children have more experiences. The growth stage of a child is not only how much he has learned, but more importantly, how much he has learned.