It is difficult to control the dominance of one person, and 200 to 300 people rely on one person to eat. After a long time, it is inevitable to put on airs. This is the crux.

Strategy:

This situation can be avoided if two people suppress each other and supervise each other.

Measures:

Promote a chef to be a chef (the salary fluctuates slightly or remains the same, as you said, it is estimated that the chef is responsible for shopping, right? Even if he can't cook, it's an incentive for him. ) Take turns to buy food and let them "encourage" each other.

Results:

In one case, the old chef left his job. Better quit. As long as he says no at one end, you can help him with the formalities at once. "Old man who loves delicate feelings" is hard to use, so it is better not to use it. Using new people is more energetic and faster. Newcomers love to show off.

Another situation is that the old chef uses personal relationship to interfere. Look who he is looking for. If it affects you, don't participate any more. You're not the only one who eats. You can encourage people with strength and connections to do this, and you are in charge behind the scenes. Doing things for leaders can only be done right, not wrong. If you think you will make a mistake, don't do it early. Seek no merit, but no fault.

This is a way for the wise. If you feel trouble, I'll tell you a simple one. If you want to satisfy the leader, you have to satisfy the chef first. A chef is nothing more than money. If you can find a way to increase the meal fee, ask him for money, or give him the right to shop, he has the right to have money and the right to implement the interests. Naturally, he will be closer to you. You can order him to find a leader he respects and fears most. As for success, it depends on whether you can get into trouble.