According to Dahe Daily, Sun Fuxi, deputy director of the Municipal Cultural Relics Bureau, visited the guest chat room of Chinese businessmen. On the morning of June 65438+1October 3 1, com tells about the road of applying for cultural heritage in Xi and even Shaanxi. When interviewed by Chinese business hosts. Com, Sun Fuxi publicly swore. When talking about the dispute between Luoyang and Xi 'an, two ancient capitals, about the starting point of the Silk Road, the Chinese business host. Com Q: Netizens argued about the problems in Shaanxi Province and Henan Province and raised some questions. They put forward some suggestions. Can we set up some signs at the beginning of the Silk Road in Xi 'an?
Sun Fuxi said: "I don't think it is necessary ... Henan people will say that we are part of the Silk Road. The reason they said was that Luoyang was the capital of the Eastern Han Dynasty. He said there can be multiple starting points, so how many birthdays do you have here? Can his mother have him many times? Only once. Who is here in the world and who gave birth to him twice in Henan? They also want to protect their own interests. We must respect culture and respect the ancestors of the Chinese nation. "
Sun Fuxi's words were quickly posted and spread by netizens all over the country, especially the dirty word "Who is here in the world and who gave birth to him twice in Henan", which became his iconic language and was widely quoted by netizens, triggering a new debate.
Henan netizens want to formally sue and demand an apology.
On the afternoon of Sun Fuxi's scolding of Henan people, Dahe netizens "lost a leaf" posted Sun Fuxi's original words to the "Developing Henan" section of Dahe Forum with the title "xi 'an Cultural Relics Director was scolded", which immediately triggered an earthquake-like response among Dahe netizens.
Netizen Luo Shen 8 replied: "If it makes sense, different opinions can be argued, but this will scold all Henan people. Obviously the level is too low and they are angry. "
Netizens "Guling Homeowner" and "Qiansehua" all think that the quality of this official is too low. Netizen "Cucumber Buyi" replied: "As the deputy director of the Cultural Relics Bureau, you should have basic cultural literacy. From this point of view, Sun Fuxi is obviously unqualified. "
Sun Fuxi's remarks were also posted on various online forums, such as the City Forum of xinhuanet, the Chinese Business Forum of Huashang. com, Xi 'an, the ancient capital of Baige Forum, and Xixiang Forum in Shaanxi, which aroused heated discussions among netizens. Only in Xinhua's "City Forum". The number of hits on this post soon exceeded 4000.
The reply of Xinhua netizen "being reasonable and not afraid of being blocked" pointed out that there should be an attitude of arguing about problems, such as two debaters, one is neither humble nor arrogant, and the other is swearing when he is in a hurry. Regardless of who is a good debater, you can tell his quality just by his manner.
Netizen "Cool Travel Without Borders" thinks that as a government official, it is really shameful for him to make such remarks in public. "Swim Without Borders" believes that Sun Fuxi attacked Luoyang with such vulgar words. The first thing others can see is not whether Luoyang is the starting point of the Silk Road, but the barbarity and vulgarity that a government official should not have.
Donghua, the host of the forum "Xi 'an, the ancient capital", said that as a government official, this is an open insult to all the people in Henan, and it is easy to fall behind the population and there is no good end.
Netizens from Dahezhou, "Wandering for a Leaf" and "Cool Travel Without Borders", said that in view of Sun Fuxi's swearing in public places as a government official, they had decided to bring a lawsuit to the court and formally asked Sun Fuxi to apologize to the people of Henan.
In this regard, Meng, a senior lawyer of Henan Law Firm, said that Sun Fuxi's original words contained obvious insulting words, slandered the image of Henan people and were suspected of reputational infringement. Internet users in Henan can file an infringement lawsuit with the court to safeguard their rights and interests. Meng also said that as a native of Henan, he was angry when he saw these words. He is willing to provide free legal support for these netizens and jointly safeguard the image of Henan people.
Luoyang has long been recognized by the State Council.
During the discussion, some netizens also suggested that Sun Fuxi's words would trigger a new round of debate between Luoyang and xi 'an on the starting point of the Silk Road.
It is understood that this debate began in early August 2006, and the International Coordination Meeting on the World Cultural Heritage Declaration of the Silk Road, sponsored by the UNESCO World Heritage Center and National Cultural Heritage Administration, China, was held in Xinjiang. The resolution formed at the meeting pointed out that the China section of the Silk Road began in the east and west of China (Luoyang and Chang 'an) in the Han Dynasty around A.D. and ended in the late Qing Dynasty. As soon as this news was released, it immediately attracted the attention of Luoyang and Xi, and caused the dispute between the two cities.
In fact, this debate has long been settled. In April this year 1 1, the National Tourism Administration officially released the master plan of the Silk Road tourist area, clearly pointing out that Luoyang, as the starting point of the eastern end of the Silk Road, has been included in the plan. Most experts on the Silk Road also believe that the Silk Road originated in Xi 'an, but as the Eastern Han regime moved its capital, Luoyang became a new starting point.
Regarding the online debate caused by Sun Fuxi's remarks, Ji, a professor of sociology at Zhengzhou University, pointed out in an interview with the media that government civil servants represent the government, so we should pay attention to the basic qualities that civil servants should have and the image of the government. The dispute over the starting point itself is not a big deal, but when government officials publicly express this matter, they should first proceed from Scientific Outlook on Development and proceed from the overall situation of win-win cooperation.
On June 365438+1October 3 1 2007, Sun Fuxi, deputy director of the Municipal Cultural Relics Bureau, was interviewed by Chinese businessmen. About the application of the Silk Road, he talked about the eastern starting point of the Silk Road. Sun Fuxi, deputy director, believes that the starting point of the East must be xi 'an. Deputy Director Sun thinks this view is unrealistic and refutes the query that "the two Silk Roads start at the same time" put forward by some netizens:
"We attended many meetings. When talking about this issue in Henan, many people said not to talk about it. History will be established in time and space. People in Henan will say that we are part of the Silk Road. The reason they said was that Luoyang was the capital of the Eastern Han Dynasty. He said there can be multiple starting points, so how many birthdays do you have here? Can his mother have him many times? Only once. Who is here in the world and who gave birth to him twice in Henan? They also want to protect their own interests. We must respect culture and respect the ancestors of the Chinese nation. "
However, this passage was caught by a media in Henan. On June 6th, 165438+' s article "Deputy Director of xi Cultural Relics Bureau was interviewed and cursed, provoking netizens to denounce" was published publicly, and Mr. Sun Fuxi, Deputy Director of Xi Cultural Relics Bureau, vigorously played up the image of Henan people.
Is that really the case?
Chinese businessmen. Com contacted Deputy Director Sun Fuxi for the first time today and learned that he has gone to Korea for a meeting, which is still unknown. Under the reporter's brief explanation, Secretary Sun was surprised and angry, and said that he would respond to this matter after returning to China in a few days.
The reporter also interviewed a professor from the School of Journalism and Communication, who didn't want to get involved in the dispute. From the linguistic point of view, the teacher thinks that there are the following points: "First, it is not to slander Henan people, but to make an analogy with birthdays, which shows that the Silk Road can only have a starting point; Second, it is not specifically aimed at Henan people. Who gave birth to him twice in Henan? The front is "Who is here?" What he wants to say is that no one can be born twice, including Henan people. Third, the reason why this passage caused misunderstanding among netizens, especially those in Henan, may also be because what Sun Fuxi said was too colloquial. If it is changed to this: He said that there can be multiple starting points, how many birthdays do you have here? Everyone can only have one birth experience. Everyone here, people all over the world, including Henan people, can't have two births or two birthdays. The starting point of the Silk Road is like a person's birthday. There can only be one, so there will be no such misunderstanding. "
According to Henan media reports, this incident has aroused strong repercussions in Xinhuanet, Huashang.com and Dahe.com, and I am afraid it is also inaccurate. At least for Chinese businessmen. At present, no netizens have greatly exaggerated this matter, and no netizens think this passage is an insult to Henan compatriots.