At the beginning of my freshman year, I didn't think the students in my class were that dark, because I was the League Secretary of our class. At that time, it was the poor students selected by my class, that is, the poverty subsidy given by the state. I remember that several people were finalized by several class cadres. Later, I heard that the monitor of our class went to these people privately, told them that this poverty allowance was promoted by him alone, and then asked others for benefits. I didn't think it was true at the time. It was not until my sophomore year that I heard such a thing again, because I was not familiar with those classmates in my freshman year. In my sophomore year, a good friend of mine was also on the poverty list, and he told me. He asked me if my monitor strongly recommended him to give him a chance to enjoy the state's poverty allowance. I was confused. I said what happened. He said that the monitor asked me for benefits, and I said how much. He said that the poverty allowance is 5000. 1 person per year, and the monitor said that one person is half. I remember that there were more than a dozen poor students in our class at that time, and half of them were 2500, 10, which was 25000. I was furious at that time, and the poverty subsidy given by the state became their money-making machine. It was really shameless at that time, and then I but later, our secretary didn't say anything. It turns out that they and the monitor are both in the same group. It was really dark. I really despise this kind of intrigue. I can only say that I am really disappointed in this teacher-student relationship!