Compared with range hoods, integrated stoves are better. We should first look at the difference between the two, and then use data to illustrate the problem. In terms of performance, integrated stoves are obviously dominant, and individuals prefer integrated stoves:

Difference 1: The way of smoking is different.

The integrated stove is very close to the lampblack, and the lampblack is sucked away as soon as it is produced, so it is too late to spread. According to statistics, the proportion of oil fume absorbed by general integrated stoves is above 90%.

However, the range hood is relatively high from the stove and too short to operate, so the proportion of oil fume absorption is relatively low, about 50%, and even the best range hood can only reach 60%.

Difference 2: There are differences in security systems.

The integrated stove does not meet the requirements, and the equipment has leakage protection. In case of leakage, the power supply will be cut off automatically, and personal safety is guaranteed. Because the range hood is overhead, it is too high to smoke effectively, and it is easy to meet when it is low, especially for people who are taller. Meetings are frequent and have potential safety hazards.

Difference 3: The cleaning difficulty is different.

The traditional range hood should be cleaned once or twice a year, otherwise the fan will be blocked by oil fume, and the noise of the fan will be loud, and the oil fume absorption effect will be obviously reduced. The integrated stove basically solves the cleaning problem by using the design, and the oil will automatically flow into the box for collecting waste oil, which basically does not need cleaning.

From the above description, the overall performance of the integrated range hood is obviously much stronger than that of the range hood, but the price of the integrated range is also relatively expensive, so the specific choice depends on personal economic conditions.