Hope it is useful to you
①After the hodgepodge and Sanlu milk powder in 2008, negative incidents about various foods broke out intensively, and an article began to circulate on the Internet: China is entering a phase of mutual poisoning. era. Five years have passed, and the question now may be, how can we get out of this era of mutual poisoning?
How many "toxic" things happened in the past week? "Shen Nong Dan" poisonous ginger in Weifang, Shandong; fake mutton in Shanghai; mineral water standards; and groundwater and river pollution that have long been commonplace. Along with this, no official in the regulatory authorities, which takes taxpayers' money and is responsible for public food safety, has taken responsibility so far.
Let’s take a look at some related news in the past week. Wuhan’s environmental protection department has opened cases to investigate and deal with 60 illegal pollutant discharge companies this year, with penalties amounting to 1.95 million yuan. 14 companies in Shandong were fined a total of 350,000 yuan for discharging sewage underground. 88 companies in North China were involved in polluting groundwater, with a total amount of more than 6.13 million yuan. To sum it up, the average fine for each polluting company is less than 50,000. I believe that no matter how positive your eyes are, you cannot see "punishment" in it. It is more like Chinese parents spanking their children symbolically, even though these children are guilty of poisoning.
The poisoning case of a Fudan graduate student has once again made the case of Zhu Ling of Tsinghua University a hot topic. Although it was not timely, the Beijing Public Security Bureau responded publicly. Although a bit sad, we must admit that this is progress. This is not the first time that Zhu Ling's case has been hotly discussed on the Internet. Similar cases in the past have been eliminated invisible. In response to this response, netizens have new dissatisfaction and doubts, and they also look forward to Beijing police providing more detailed explanations and information. The rule of law in China requires positive interactions within and outside the system, and an open, transparent and timely response before major sensitive cases is the best opportunity to rebuild people's trust in the "rule of law."
According to official reports, the incident of "Anhui young girl falling from a building and dying" has been settled. The Beijing police have ruled out the possibility of poisoning, sexual assault and homicide through on-site investigation, autopsy, and video combing. Family members expressed this There is no objection. The criminal suspect who previously spread rumors on the Internet has also been arrested. Some commentators believe that netizens should reflect on why they easily believe and spread rumors. Some netizens believe that the public has the right to question and express doubts. Where is the line between doubt and rumor? What are the limits of the government’s power to judge rumors and punish criminal suspects? Why do people distrust the government and often take to the streets to "make trouble"? Why do netizens not believe in refuting rumors and always "believe rumors and spread rumors"?
These are old questions, and we may not be able to give correct answers, but what is certain is that our social mechanism has been poisoned, which hinders mutual trust in this society and punishes evil. Promote kindness and create a virtuous circle. No matter what kind of dream you pursue, you should first get rid of this "poison", because it is related to the basic bottom line of a society. Without these, no matter how beautiful the dream is, it will become a balloon that has escaped from the hand. The higher it flies, the more dangerous it is.
②The case of Zhu Ling and the poisoning case of Fudan graduate students have made the long-silent case of Zhu Ling of Tsinghua University once again become a hot topic. In 1994, Zhu Ling, a female student from the Chemistry Department of Tsinghua University, fell ill mysteriously, which was confirmed to be a rare form of "thallium poisoning", resulting in total paralysis. The police once determined that the murderer was "by" Zhu Ling's side, but in the end the case was dropped. In the past 20 years, various speculations and legends about "who is the murderer" have never stopped.
There is no reason that can convince the public that an ordinary criminal poisoning case has internal entanglements and is still unwilling to lift the lid. Xinhua News Agency’s “Seven Questions” are nothing more than the public’s unanimous questions about the Zhu Ling case: What is the reason why the Zhu Ling case has been unresolved for 19 years so far? What evidence did the police have at the time? Where is the case stuck? Is the police's statement that "there is only one layer of window paper left" true, and which suspect does it point to? Why were the inquiries and even the application for information disclosure of Zhu Ling’s family delayed and not informed? What does the mysterious and mysterious so-called "other circumstances under which laws, regulations and relevant provisions are not disclosed" specifically refer to? In particular, the public is questioning whether there was any improper "interference" by the authorities in this case back then.
The public clamored, and justice was humiliated.
The latest "Global Times" editorial puts forward a point of view "Zhu Ling case: public opinion needs to calm down, and the official should respond."
The meaning I understand should focus on the official side: on the one hand, public opinion has shown rare rationality in the Zhu Ling case. Although there are various speculations and rumors, most of them basically follow logical deductions or provide the judicial department with a version of public opinion. There is no violence that violates procedures, and there is no personal attack that builds momentum. Such attention is itself progress in the construction of the rule of law, because Pound said, "The public's indifference to rights and trials is a bad sign for the law." The public paid a lot of attention to Zhu Ling's case and turned their attention into positive energy, which in itself is a sign of trust and advancement in the law and the rule of law. There is no problem of being "calm" or not, nor is it a bad thing.
On the other hand, what really needs to be questioned is precisely the ambiguous attitude of the relevant departments on the Zhu Ling case. The longer the ambiguous and lingering incident lasts, the more obvious the fourfold harm it brings: First, it harms the truth about right and wrong. No matter who the murderer is, the tragic multiple poisonings have exceeded the bottom line of human ethics. The second is the harm to the client Zhu Ling and his family. His youthful years were withered due to being poisoned. The dignity of life, health rights, and the fate of his family members involved in it are unimaginable sorrow for others; The third is the harm to the so-called relevant "suspects". As rumors spread virally, various versions that may be contrary to the truth have delineated many named citizens. Their privacy rights have been "humanized" and moral crosses have been imposed. The courts and the courts may not necessarily go in the same direction; fourth, it harms the credibility of the judiciary. Cases that have already started judicial procedures have been delayed for a long time. Will the belief in the law and the fairness of the judiciary be tarnished by the unclear Zhu Ling case? ?
Will it take another 19 years for Zhu Ling and his family who were wrongfully murdered to see the dawn of justice? Can Zhu Ling's parents still wait for this result?
Everything, but still the old saying: In the Zhu Ling case, only the truth can make people feel at ease!
③Food safety: Are our lives and safety becoming more and more despicable, or are officials’ positions becoming more and more valuable? Is the public becoming stronger and more invulnerable, or is society becoming more indifferent and numb?
The field of food safety has been in turmoil recently, including the "Shen Nong Dan" poisoned ginger incident in Weifang, Shandong, the fake mutton incident in Shanghai where uninspected meat such as fox meat and mouse meat was passed off as mutton, and the bottled packaging incident that is still entangled today With the standard and quality issues of water and bottled water, Chinese people’s confidence in food safety and table safety has once again dropped to an all-time low. In connection with the incidents of gutter oil, clenbuterol pork, chickens raised with antibiotics, Sudan red, poisonous kelp, liquor plasticizers, leather milk and other incidents that have been continuously exposed in recent years, as netizens joke: "China on the tip of the tongue is ushering in the blooming of poisons." "
Faced with the public's sorrow and anger, the relevant departments responded quickly. Within a few days, the results of the fake mutton incident were announced. The leaders attached great importance to it, and the regulatory authorities conducted thorough investigations day and night. It turned out that it was a small number of unscrupulous traders who had lost their conscience, so they arrested profiteers, closed down illegal shops, closed down operations for rectification, and they were successful. This is probably the basic routine for dealing with most food safety issues. However, we cannot help but ask, now that we have such rapid and efficient response capabilities, where is the daily supervision? Could it be that if anything goes wrong, it's really all the responsibility of a few small traders? Who is really responsible?
The public must still have an impression of the melamine incident a few years ago. In that incident, many officials, including the deputy secretary of the Shijiazhuang Municipal Party Committee and the mayor, were dismissed from their posts. It was almost the first time that the food safety issue attracted national attention. The local government showed its strength and determination to deal with the incident and gave the public an explanation. However, as various issues such as food and environmental protection continue to arise, such determination and intensity are becoming increasingly rare. For example, last year's Lankao fire that killed seven people, the local government only dealt with a few Civil Affairs Bureau cadres. No wonder Xinhua News Agency commented: "In the face of turbulent public opinion, Lankao finally responded. Six people including the County Civil Affairs Bureau were better than Zhizhi." The young official was suspended for inspection, but this result was worth the weight of seven lives.
”
Is our life and safety becoming more and more despicable, or are the positions of officials becoming more and more valuable? Is the public becoming stronger and more invulnerable, or is the society becoming more and more indifferent and numb? ? Who is to blame for all this? Is it really necessary for one or two lives to be taken for the "officials" to feel that something serious is wrong and to apologize and remove themselves from office as a matter of routine?
< p> In the face of food safety and other incidents suffered by the people, can our officials act from their conscience, muster the courage to hand in their own resignation letters? We need to encourage officials.④ Xiangyang Fire (slightly earlier): The Xiangyang Fire claimed 14 lives. CCTV only broadcast Boston
In the early morning of April 14, a fire broke out at the Yijing City Garden Hotel on Qianjin East Road, Fancheng District, Xiangyang, Hubei Province. 14 people died and 47 were injured. The youngest victim was only five years old.
The fire started in the Internet cafe on the first floor and quickly spread to the upper floors. From the footage, you can see that the scene was dense. Smoke was billowing and an open fire was burning on the first floor. During the fire, a man who was standing above the window escaped from the room and fell from the fourth floor due to lack of strength. There was also a group of people waiting outside the window on the second floor. Rescue. This disaster, which was called "Hell on Earth", received no media coverage for the first time. The second time, there was no comfort from the leaders. The third time, a terrorist attack occurred in Boston, and almost all the media paid attention to it. In Boston, no one pays attention to the fate of this group of compatriots who should be concerned.
Netizens who were crying in their hearts posted on Weibo: "When 22 (primary school students) were stabbed in Guangshan (Henan). At that time, the Central Television (CCTV) was criticizing the shooting of an American primary school student; when the bird flu broke out in China, CCTV was broadcasting the Amazon tide; when an Internet cafe fire in Xiangyang killed more than 60 people, the headlines on our website were all about the Boston terrorist attack... I won’t say anything, let’s light a candle together for the deceased. ”
Lin Ping in Japan: At 2:50 this morning, Beijing time, an explosion occurred in Boston, killing 3 people and injuring 144 people. The U.S. Capitol lowered its flag at half-mast in mourning. Chinese media across the ocean used large banners to express condolences. The special feature is rolling coverage of the explosion. The day before, our Xiangyang fire killed 14 and injured 47. The victims were as young as 5 years old. The Chinese media, please report more on them. On the balance of life. , everyone's weight is equal.
Independence starts when one person travels: last year's school shooting, yesterday's Boston bombing, the first person to stand up was the White House, and the president lowered the flag at half-mast. On the other side of the earth, when similar incidents occur, you can only view them online, and they may disappear in an instant. The first thing you see is always "the family members of the deceased are currently emotionally stable." The moon in the United States is not rounder than elsewhere, and we don't want it. There is no need to compare. The dignity of life transcends nationalities.