In this way, the deviation of the world that each of us sees will become bigger and bigger, but there will be so-called collective values that balance our subjectivity.
When you start to look at it with other people's eyes, you will see the essence more, and you will be closer to the essence of the world.
How can imagination be infinite? Imagination is all based on cognition and cannot surpass cognition.
Because our world is not ready to accommodate so many strange things.
If some phenomena cannot be explained by known disciplines and knowledge, we should learn to respect the remaining explanations, regardless of whether they are absurd or bizarre on the surface. Because that's probably the real answer. However, the process of verification must be cautious and careful, and it is not allowed to be starry.
Theoretically, there is no normal person, because the concept of normal is recognized by the group.
Only when you do something seriously will you realize your soul.
? I heard this book in my early years, and it was very popular. Even a TV series with the same name was published. It was put into the bookshelf as a follow-up, but it was always eating ash. Because I have a habit of reading books, I don't like to read the introduction first and search for the book reviews online. I feel that it is a spoiler and reading other people's feelings will affect my understanding. On the contrary, I prefer to read in a blind box, and the understanding feeling is more real and more like my own. Until some time ago, I read the first two articles, one is a case, and each case is a separate story, which is my favorite type. Then I can't help but get to know the author and wonder what kind of idea the author wants to write this book. The discovery stems from the author's curiosity about the world, because a greeting card wants to know what the world is like, to travel around the world, and to find the answer through various channels and ways, but it is still not very clear, so I began to ask my friends around me, but the answers I got were not very serious. I accidentally came into contact with another group and found it very interesting. "We usually look at things from the outside, and mental patients directly get into things and look from the inside out." Later, I compiled and wrote this book. Therefore, the whole book records the "people inside" (mental patients, mental disorders, etc.) in the form of interviews (I prefer to call them "people outside" and "people inside", which will make me feel that there is only a difference in location) so that people can see the world in the eyes of other people.
The author did what I always wanted to do and wanted to know. About the middle and high school period, perhaps influenced by TV dramas and movies, I always thought that the people inside were extremely smart, so I always wanted to know what we and the world were like in their eyes in real life, and I wanted to know what was different. I remember once, at the weekend, I took my friend and accompanied me to a mental nursing home across the river from the town. When I arrived at the door, I was dissuaded by my friend for various reasons, and I went away, but I was always curious. Thanks to the author's curiosity and persistence in the world, he can learn about the world from other angles and get to know another group.
? Personally, after reading it, I think that genius and madman have something in common in some ways, and their worlds are also incomprehensible. They are all alone in their own worlds.
? In fact, I didn't have a definite answer to this question until the end of the article. I don't know how to give a description. It is the beautiful scenery of mountains and rivers, the daily comings and goings of people, the daily rising and setting of the sun, and the daily performance of different things, the coexistence and survival of various creatures. This is a description I can describe. It seems that I am not so clear and vague about the world in my eyes, just like the fog in my eyes.
? First, I felt my lack of knowledge, and I also understood that the author said that they were "drilling directly into things and looking from the inside out". The people inside were physics professors, psychologists, religious inheritance, etc. The article involved physiology, psychology, Buddhism, religion, quantum physics, Mayan civilization and many other fields, and there were many quantum mechanics. What impressed me deeply was a case of "spiritual transmission" in the article, a physics professor. Confirm whether it is a mental patient, so there is such a case: the patient insists on the multi-universe theory, and he is transmitted from the earth of that universe one month later by gravitational particles, and has been waiting for the organization to take him back. The patient has abundant knowledge of quantum physics and has his own logic in his cognition, which is perfect and professional.
? The second feeling is persistence. In fact, after reading it, they have a common point-paranoia, and there are some persistence in it. They are constantly curious and exploring the world in their own eyes, and want to see it clearly, and they are not influenced by things next to them. It is very clear, so some patients are very professional in some fields.
? The third feeling is intense loneliness. "Outsiders" are a large group, and their world and understanding are different from those of large groups, so it is difficult to find "the same kind", and even if others say it, they don't understand it, and they can't understand it, just like their whole world has always been lived by themselves, round and round.
? The first feeling is the author's warmth. When communicating with every patient (a special group that is traditionally considered), we don't bring secular ideas and vision, but respect each patient's sharing, try our best to make ourselves understand their descriptions, and we don't judge the so-called right and wrong of their world understanding at will with our own cognition. We don't feel the author's differential treatment between words, but we can feel that the author is respectful and all beings are equal.
? Secondly, I feel from the author and patients that the cognition is limited by keeping questioning things and keeping humble attitude towards knowledge. Humans can't explain things beyond cognition with existing cognition. Even if someone explains unknown things with ridiculous answers, they should not deny them, but should also respect their existence and explain them, allowing opposing viewpoints to explain their existence. You should persist in pursuing and exploring what you love, and have no distractions. Only when you do something seriously can you realize your soul.
My feeling of the whole book is very warm and healing. There are humorous fragments of the patient and the author, followed by questioning, thinking, persistence and loneliness. There is something to learn and reflect on, not to mention that this small group can be understood, but it is unknown to hope to be respected and allowed. Being allowed is a different answer and treated with an equal eye.