Let's start with the bright line. This is the core of the entire text, but also must remember the points, we should have read the text. The first paragraph needless to say, this paragraph is mainly in the writing of people to spend money on which goods on the question.
First, as the scale of production continues to expand, intensive management has become inevitable, limited labor is more and more difficult to meet the increasing demand for consumption. Second, the production of goods is a part of the service, the production of goods is the need for a large number of laborers, through the production of goods, people can obtain the largest amount of surplus value. Third, the per capita value of society is determined by the per capita output of the optimal intensive production of commodities, per capita output continues to increase, the increase in the average value of society will inevitably exceed the per capita impact of economic globalization.
Fourth, to a large extent, the monetary value produced by the intensive mode of operation is not self-increasing, especially in the current low inflation situation. Five some of the goods can be self-valuing, such as the production of commodity value of the efficiency is not high, such as physical gold, still has the people absolute scarcity, if the old for some of the goods can be self-valuing to spend money, is the capital of the maximum profit to go away.
Well, we look back at the structure of the text.
The first paragraph begins with a dialogue between two people who are talking about the problems of intensive business model production, both domestic and foreign. Then they talk about the primary industry, China, the United States and the developed countries in the West, etc., all produce optimized commodities intensively, and they mention that we also produce optimized commodities intensively, and we have to give up some of the intensive management in order to improve the production efficiency.
Then they talk about the primary sector, which is agriculture and industry. The conversation then turns to the production of self-valuing commodities, and of course there is a darker line when it comes to the relationship between commodity prices and market prices.
The dark line goes back to the relationship between the demand of individual consumers and the supply of producers, including income inequality, childlessness, labor shortages, and levels of social development. Individual consumers will have intensive and optimized consumption preferences.
This was followed by a combination of implicit and explicit references to prices in commodity markets, from supermarkets to consumer food, from drinks to fast food, and, of course, to structural unemployment. It then ends with a dialog and a final reference to the intertwining of bright and dark lines, the bright line being demand and the dark line being price.
This whole intertwining of bright and dark lines of conflict has been at the heart and center of the development of Chinese society over the years, with price changes affecting the trend of social development.
Well, here are the dark lines. With the increasing scale of production, intensive operation has become inevitable, limited labor is more and more difficult to meet the increasing demand for consumption. Second, the production of goods is a part of the service, the production of goods is a large number of labor, through the production of goods, people can get the most surplus value.
Third, the per capita value of society is determined by the per capita output of the optimal intensive production of commodities, per capita output continues to increase, the increase in the average value of society will inevitably be more than the economic globalization of people.