This sophistry can't even do the most basic logical self-consistency, and it will fool those who have less social experience.

What is logical self-consistency? Logical self-consistency refers to a linguistic principle that a theory is not contradictory in the statement of the language itself. People did not find any contradiction through careful analysis of the text symbols of this theory, and realized self-improvement.

If you think about it carefully, you will find that there is a logical loophole in this statement: you go to a restaurant to buy rice, order one first, and then change this into another. After all, you bought a meal, so you have to pay for it.

Don't say you didn't eat your first meal. Why did you pay? Where did you have your second meal? Did you change the first meal? That is, you traded the first meal. You traded your first meal. Why don't you have to pay for the first meal?

Let me show you an advanced sophistry:

There was a very famous philosophical proposition in ancient China called "A white horse is not a horse".

Horses, so life is also shaped. White, so life color is also. Life color is not life shape, so a white horse is not a horse.

"Horse" is the regulation of the shape of things, and "white horse" is the regulation of the color of horses. The rules on color and shape are naturally different. Therefore, because of the different regulations on different concepts, white horses and horses are also different.

Although it is still sophistry, the logic here is self-consistent and much stronger than eating noodles.

Baidu encyclopedia-white horse is not a horse