Does love lie in everlasting love or in having a debate competition?

A debate competition is also called a debate competition, and it is also called a debate meeting. In form, it is a competition activity in which the two participating parties debate a certain issue. In fact, it is a competition of relevant knowledge around the debate issue, a competition of thinking and reaction ability, and a competition of language expression ability. It is also a comprehensive competition. Competition of abilities. The following is a debate I compiled about whether love lasts forever or whether it once had one. Let’s take a look.

Is love to last forever or to have had a debate? Chapter 1 Thank you, Chairman, thank you to the judges:

After listening to the idealistic and romantic arguments of the other debate partner, we are extremely ashamed. Because there is neither romantic imagination nor flashy rhetoric in our defense. Some are just objective facts and truths that are absolutely true and cannot be denied.

Now, I clearly put forward my point of view: "Love does not lie in lasting forever, but in having once had it."

Human beings hold two views on love, namely the so-called "everlasting" love based on subjective imagination, which is a love as long as the existence of heaven and earth. And the love that "had" based on objective facts, that is, the love that has been experienced before.

So, how do we truly have love? It is true that the "love" that people pursue from the day they fall in love is the hope that the love they "once had" can "last forever". Whether it is "having" or "lasting" are people's desire and pursuit. However, in the real society, it is simply impossible to achieve the nihilistic "everlasting" that people pursue. The temptation of "money" and the influence of "conditions" in real life have obliterated many love dreams of "everlasting" in the world. And retaining a copy of the most sincere and beautiful memories of having paid for love, owned, and been happy may be the choice of most people.

Some people say: "Love is eternal, but there is no eternal love." This is a very philosophical interpretation.

Love is eternal, and what happened is always real. When we were in love, we truly had each other, and we truly had each other. For love itself, everything that happened at that time was Unforgettable. However, as time goes by and the relationship deepens, problems such as social worldliness and family pressure gradually invade. Love also fades until it disappears completely, but love once existed and each other was sincerely devoted to each other. Although it does not last forever, the love once had is the most praiseworthy love in the world. And those lovers who are in love with each other but are inseparable in appearance are physically close to each other. We are close at hand but our souls are far away. From the outside, such a couple seems to last forever, but their love may not "live for more than a day". Friend of the other party, wouldn't you rather have an illusory "eternal life" that seems to be in harmony but is far apart? Do you want a "once owned" with flesh and blood, love and hate?

Although the love we once had is like a shooting star, it is this short but vigorous and thorough moment that can bloom into the most poignant and brilliant brilliance, enough for both parties to remember it for a lifetime! Maybe there is nothing in this world that lasts forever, but only boundless thoughts and regrets! They will haunt the lonely party all the time! In other words, true eternity is what we once had, because true love does not lie in the length of time, but in whether two souls can rely on each other so that each other does not feel lonely.

Only in this way can it be called true love. Dear fellow debater on the other side! wake up! Please come back to our real world from that dreamy wonderland!

Finally, I once again remind the opposing debaters to stop insisting on your idealistic and romantic arguments. Your eternal life can only be the pain and regret of "eternal time will eventually end, and this hatred will last forever". Let us live in objective reality, in the mortal world, and let us experience the true love we "once had" together!

(Free debate)

Second argument from the affirmative: The other party also admitted just now that there is a difference between marriage and love. So I would like to ask, marriage is not caused by love. Why do you emphasize that "lasting forever" leads to unhappy marriages? This is one of them. Secondly, what is the concept of "used to have" by the other party's debate partner? Does what you “used to have” violate people’s normal ethics and morals? Please answer directly.

Four negative arguments: Indeed, when you walk into the marriage hall, you are thinking, yes, my love will last forever. However, after you have been tempered in life for such a long time, you realize, oh, it turns out that my love can only be had once. But when love disappears, marriage must continue. The disappearance of love does not mean that responsibility disappears, responsibility still exists. (Applause)

Three arguments from the affirmative: Then let’s test it for one month, only one month. If you find out a month later that your marriage is not based on love, it proves that you did not get married because of love, but because of responsibility.