Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Food recipes - In the second season of Master Chef, Zhao Dan won the championship without any doubt. But why did so many viewers question and belittle Zhao Dan in the second season?
In the second season of Master Chef, Zhao Dan won the championship without any doubt. But why did so many viewers question and belittle Zhao Dan in the second season?
I am "unintentional melancholy" and hereby reply to 9527 Xu:

Your last sentence has shown your strong sense of subjective prejudice. For me, anyone can and should win the championship. Watching TV is not the result, but the process. Who won the championship? Not at all. What matters in reality shows is the word "show", not "lose" and "win". The "hope" in my heart gives me the best reason to belittle any player at will. So, should your attitude be correct? Have you tried every dish of all the contestants? Then I don't think you have doubts about a player, but about the only product Committee that has tasted every player's dishes. In that case, why do you want to watch it? Why do you say it here? Distrust of the only product committee that can show authority in the competition. What is the significance of such competition in your eyes? I don't trust the Quality Committee ... Can you still trust every player who trusts the Quality Committee? Intelligence ... mentality. You said I was partial to Zhao Dan! ? Ridiculous! Do you know why I want to top Zhao Dan in Baidu Post Bar? Because Zhao Dan is the only player who is doubted, despised and reviled by many spectators. You ... as for it? Why is it so far? Why is this happening? To talk about Hong Hongxing's strength, I believe most of the audience are well aware of it. However, for the final, Hong Hongxing's opponent deviated from his expectations, so in fact, he panicked and lost his mind. Therefore, his three dishes are not cooking deviations, but the failure of the whole strategic decision. As he himself said on TV: "In fact, I hope Ji Xiaoguang can win and become my opponent. Because in this case, I am fully confident that I can beat him. " Now that you have said it, do you need to say anything else? A player who actually took a chance in the last battle and made a direct decision when he ended up unhappy, what qualifications does he have to take away the honorary title of "master chef"? "master chef" has only one purpose for the players from beginning to end: examination. Test failed, leave; Pass the test and stay. In other words, the ultimate champion, the only champion, is not so much a victory over all his opponents as a complete victory over himself, the one who passed all the tests and stayed. Any opponent is the opponent of other opponents, which is the test and necessary condition to overcome oneself. "master chef" tests, exercises and cultivates the overall strength of players. Just one or two games won't give any player a chance to escape the test. Therefore, they must go all out in every game, which is a subconscious requirement for all players under the system. Many people can avoid opponents that Zhao Dan doesn't want to face after winning in the early stage. This is the hard evidence that many viewers believe that "Zhao Dan has made a final conclusion", but their subjective consciousness is too strong, and once again they ignore one of the most important factors: giving opponents a chance to pinch each other will only lead to self-comparison.

A player who is stronger than he originally imagined. Giving yourself a chance is equivalent to giving other players a chance to turn over. I have to admire the program planning of Top Chef. Such interesting competition system and rules are actually the most attractive charm of master chef. Only in such a perfect program system can any player show everything about himself and give you a perfect stage. You just have to dance your own dance wholeheartedly.