The Iron Alchemist is actually a very good cartoon, but if you want to compare it with One Piece and Naruto, you can only say that each has its own merits. Whether it is the fighting scene in Huo Ying or the plot development of pirates, each work has its own strengths, so there is no need for the subject to flaunt his depth in this way. This kind of problem can easily lead to the advance of the war.

Depth is not the only criterion for animation. In addition to its depth, The Alchemist of Steel has a good place, that is, it can satisfy the audience's desire to pretend. Animation is originally a place with more fake decorations, as long as Xuancheng likes death notes, One Piece, Attack Giant, Naruto and so on. Many times, you can stand on the top of morality, automatically omit the discussion process, and belittle other illogical animation works at will, just as you can become a philosopher after watching The Steel Alchemist.

Huo Ying avoided the disadvantages of the rigid struggle of the Dragon Ball in the later period, combined the ninja culture with Japanese mythology, and described colorful ninja rules. This wonderful and changeable battle alone is enough for the young people of that year to imitate and enjoy constantly. Of course, in the eyes of people who blindly pursue depth: "There is nothing to boast about." Then you don't have to care too much. What is the basic principle of equivalent exchange? If you like talking about depth so much, why do we need to watch animation? Why don't we read more serious literature and philosophy books?

When we look at a work, we don't have to compare it with too many other works, otherwise you will find that you will be seen.