The key word in this incident is "disrespect". Let me talk about the "disrespect" involved.

1. The communication between the Geng Fang team and the program crew caused "disrespect". The program crew said that the Geng side team was not serious or did not read the script. The Geng side team said that they read the script, and the program team added scenes and changed the scene on the spot (what a scandal?

, dancing with injuries, and the host’s gossipy language, etc.).

Second, the conflict between Geng Fang’s team and the program crew caused “disrespect”. The program crew said Geng Fang’s team suddenly stopped recording and their words were excessive, while Geng Fang’s team said they found it difficult to accept and did not act excessively.

(What about shouting, being rude, leaving, etc.).

First of all, I am neutral on the above two points, because there is no basis for what I say or there is evidence, but the credibility needs to be studied.

This is unclear and is the subject of much debate on the Internet. But what I want to say is that in addition to the two points about "respect" above, there are actually more and more important "respects" that everyone has not focused on.

talk.

This is the disrespect shown by the Gengfang team to the audience, fans from all parties, those Central Nationalities students, and other celebrities present.

Everyone was waiting for more than half an hour, but they were all ruthlessly ignored; there was also disrespect for the protagonist of the show that night, "Xtep". As the spokesperson, the Gengfang team gave "Xtep" the most "special" and unique

Ending birthday wishes.

They didn't give the show crew a chance to step down. I think they have quite a personality, but the last thing they should do is not give a step down to the birthday boy that day. Other than "disrespectful", I can't find a more civilized word to describe their behavior that day.

Did it.

Is this emphasizing courage or showing off one's limits?

The protagonist of the entire show is Xtep, not Nicholas Tse, Jolin Tsai, Wilber Pan, or Han Geng.

The theme is the 10th anniversary of Xtep (they have done specials for first-tier domestic and foreign brands such as Oreo and Pepsi before). It is only because they are the spokespersons of Xtep that it is rare for them to get together to participate in the program. Originally, the entire strike incident basically had nothing to do with him.

He was called off by his manager, and he even went on stage to apologize, but the key was his last sentence of "please respect". How could he immediately say "you were at fault first" after apologizing.

Upon hearing this, people who understand will definitely agree with the agent's absolutely extreme behavior of protecting his privacy, and he was originally asked to send blessings for Xtep's 10th anniversary, but he didn't say a blessing, and came out with a straight face and just said

Instead of apologizing + "asking for respect," his last sentence of "asking for respect" completely obliterated his apology.

Doesn't this bring back the rude and disdainful glances of the previous program crew, hosts, seniors, fans, and the audience, mainly directed at the manager, back to me?

Originally, he carried it through easily in the second half, and it was okay to pass all the problems and responsibilities to his agent (he was originally passive, and I thought he was just an overly obedient child).

But at that moment, he didn't hold on. He only felt his own grievances in his heart. He completely forgot that he was the spokesperson of Xtep at that moment. He failed to fulfill his obligation - to send Xtep tenth anniversary blessings at the last moment.

As soon as he said these words, the entire scene immediately froze. Even Wang Han and Ou Di, who usually responded very quickly, didn't know how to answer the call. The Xtep vice president rushed to answer the call and came to the rescue (this vice president was not for nothing).

Dang).

I can only say that his mind is still too young and not mature enough to be rational.

Unfortunately, without this sentence, it would basically be an issue with the manager. There would still be room for discussion with the program team, host, and Xtep. After all, this is not the first time the two parties have cooperated.

But when he said this, he offended the program team and the host, as well as the sponsor of Tiantian Shanghang, the brand he endorsed, "Xtep" (without any blessing).

He and the program are Xtep's external publicity image. Doesn't this put Xtep in a dilemma?

As an ordinary citizen who once sympathized with and admired him, I just want to say that a small amount of intolerance will mess up a big plan. You must know how to be patient and cultivate your dignity.

Finally, I would like to give him a pertinent word about his performance this time, "If you don't say that last sentence, it would be SI." (The private scandals of Feng Zhi and Zhou Cai are under great pressure from public opinion. He is under the indiscriminate bombardment of a large number of media paparazzi.

I won’t get through it anyway.)

Oh, and his agent, from a practical point of view really needs to be changed.

An artist has two external images: one is the artist; the other is his agent.

Agents can make up for the artist's shortcomings in certain aspects (such as psychology, emotion, adaptability, which are possessed by most agents), and can play a role in protecting the artist and his image on certain occasions. In emergencies,

It will receive good treatment effect like a sudden rain.

From this incident and what I know about him before, I think he has a blind spot in terms of psychological endurance (talking about scariness), his emotional outburst point is okay (at least higher than that of his agent), but he is very poor in adaptability.

Okay (such as the handling of the blessing at the end of this incident, and the disappearing method he used when he left the Korean group.).

If his agent could make up for his shortcomings in these aspects, or if his agent's public relations skills were more professional, he would have handled these incidents better in the past and would attract less abuse and slander.