"Harbin sky-high price fish".

Mr. Chen, a tourist from Jiangsu, said that on the second day of the Lunar New Year, he was taken by a tour guide to a restaurant near a scenic spot in Harbin. He found that the price of fish was only 398 yuan (anchovy) and 298 yuan.

Afterwards, they ordered three fish.

At checkout, the price was as high as more than 10,000 yuan, including 5,731 yuan for catfish (*** consumption 14.4 kilograms).

Mr. Chen believed that the store owner had written too much and was cheating customers, and the two parties had a dispute.

According to Mr. Chen, a dozen people suddenly rushed out of the store and forced them to pay the bill, and the old man was beaten.

After calling the police, the police did not handle it properly and said, "If we can't solve it, we will arrest people first."

Mr. Chen had no choice but to pay, and later sought explanation online and posted photos of his injuries.

In an interview with the Beijing News, the store owner stated that this was a "clearly marked price."

Public opinion on "sky-high-priced catfish" has reversed three times and is getting closer to the truth. Regarding the "sky-priced catfish" incident in Harbin, the special investigation team of Songbei District issued a notice on the 15th.

However, after the official conclusion of the investigation was released, the public continued to question the incident from multiple angles. Consumers involved also pointed out that the signature on the menu was falsified and there were problems with the weight of the fish.

Obviously, this investigation result has not dispelled the public's doubts, and there are still many doubts to be solved in the "sky-priced fish" incident.

Looking at the entire "sky-high-priced catfish" incident, public opinion has reversed three times within 48 hours.

In response to questions raised by the public about whether the catfish sold in the hotel is wild, whether the pricing is reasonable, whether there is a profit transmission chain when guided by tour guides and taxi drivers, and why the hotel's online reputation is extremely low, the relevant local departments should continue to dig deeper and provide the parties with the answers.

Let’s talk to the public.

On the 16th, Harbin’s “10,000-yuan fish-eating” incident caused another stir. On the evening of the 15th, local officials informed the fishing village involved that “clearly marked prices do not violate regulations.” It was then revealed that another “fish-eating at sky-high prices” incident occurred in the same fishing village at the same time.

"Anchovy head 498 yuan/catty" had not previously appeared on the menu of the fishing village involved; on the same day, Chen Yan, a tourist from Jiangsu, issued a statement through the media in Nanjing, claiming that the handwritten bill announced by the fishing village "was not signed by me" and "

He was intimidated by the store and his children were raped," etc., questioning the official investigation results.

At the same time, according to the "Beijing News" report, a local tour guide exposed the inside story, saying that he could get 60% commission for taking people to the "Exorbitant Price Fish" restaurant.

At this point, who signed the "surname Chen" on the handwritten bill?

Are the "wild fish" hawked in North Shore Wild Fishing Village really wild?

Is there a problem with the weight of the fish?

Is the fish priced reasonably?

Five major issues were raised, including whether there is a profit delivery chain for tour guides and taxi drivers to guide consumption.

What is the truth? Let’s see what the parties involved in the incident have to say.

4 Major Focuses While the media was hyping up this incident, Chen Yan, who was the person involved in the posting, chose to shut down his phone and delete the relevant Weibo posts.

His actions once aroused everyone's suspicion, and some even thought that he had a guilty conscience.

For this reason, he has been criticized in various ways online.

Netizens started a war of words over this, elevating a consumer incident to a regional attack.

Yesterday, the person involved, Chen Yan, appeared to give his own account and responded to the questions raised online.

Is the fish 14.4 kilograms or 10.4 kilograms?

Party: "The guarantee of character is 10.4 kilograms." The issue of catfish weighing has always been a concern. The hotel involved said on the 15th that they weighed the catfish at 14.4 kilograms. When the customer checked out, he said it was 10.4 kilograms. The Jiangsu customer had a southern accent.

Very seriously, the two parties had a dispute over the pronunciation of "four" and "ten". The store concluded that there was a misunderstanding in distinguishing the accents of the north and the south.

At 8:42 yesterday morning, the reporter called the mobile phone of Mr. Chen, a tourist from Changzhou, who was involved in the sky-high-priced fish incident.

After being shut down for more than a day, the call finally came through.

During the phone call, Mr. Chen answered several questions from reporters.

He said that the content posted on Weibo was completely true. The weight of the catfish was still 10.4 pounds. The store said it was 14.4 pounds, which was definitely a mistake.

"It weighs 10.4 pounds. I can vouch for my character and see it with my own eyes." Is going to eat fish a public expense?

The consumer is a self-employed non-public employee in Changzhou, Mr. Chen, who declined the request for an in-person interview.

He responded to the questions of some netizens. He said that he is a local self-employed in Changzhou, not a public official, and that he and his family traveled to Harbin at their own expense.

Regarding the question from netizens, "The actual payment was 7,200 yuan, why was it said to be 10,302 yuan?" Mr. Chen said that it was not me who paid the bill. I didn't look at the receipt when I found out the next day. When I found out later, major reports had come out.

.

First of all, I admit here that after we were beaten, the store took the initiative to offer a 30% discount.

Did you go by yourself, or was the tour guide brought into the store?

Mr. Chen: The travel agency said they would compensate us. In an interview with a local TV station in Heilongjiang, the hotel in question emphasized that Mr. Chen and his party went to the hotel on their own.

Mr. Chen denied it, saying that his team was taken there by a tour guide.

Mr. Chen said, “The local travel agency kept apologizing to us and offering us compensation, but we never accepted it.